Please re-consider
A planned move by the
education authorities to make a pass in English at the GCE (O/L)
exam a necessary qualification for admission to Advanced Level
classes has understandably come in for flak by parents and the
teacher unions alike.
They have asked Education Minister Susil Premajayantha not to
deny students who fail in English at the GCE (O/L) examination
an opportunity to enter A/L classes.
The concern of these segments are certainly justified given
the current state of play governing English education in the
country.
To begin with, the rural student who is brought up in the
idiom of the village cannot be expected to do well in an English
language paper particularly so when there is an acute dearth of
competent English teachers in rural schools.
Does this mean that even if a student passes all other
subjects undergoing much toil and hardship he is to be denied
higher education merely due to a failure in English?
What the authorities should do is try to stem the large
number of school dropouts. Placing a millstone round the necks
of students by insisting they pass English is not going to help.
Besides there are enough obstacles at present preventing
students entering university. The authorities should make sure
they don’t add to them. It is also generally known that students
in village schools don’t have the facilities such as good
libraries, computers, reading material etc. to enhance their
knowledge of English.
This certainly will give an unfair advantage to the their
city counterparts most of whom may not even need to be tutored
in English coming as they do from an elite milieu. Beside this
it is also bound to exacerbate the gulf between the cities and
villages giving rise to accusations of discrimination that
fuelled insurgencies in the past well epitomised by the slogan
Colombata kiri apita kekiri.
Blocking the path to higher education to a disadvantaged
section merely on the question of competence in English is to
say the least discriminatory in the context of the headway
enjoyed by city based students and the denial of access to a
quality English education to the rural youth.
It should be noted that these students may possess skills and
talents that go far beyond what a sound English education could
match which could be harnessed for productive purposes. Not all
our professionals and experts in various fields today rose to
their positions on their English proficiency. They succeeded by
dint of hard work and perseverance and later acquired a sound
English knowledge.
Sadly today English is insisted upon even at interviews
overlooking other skills and aptitudes of youth. How much of
these talented youth had fallen by the wayside as a result is
anyone’s guess, not to mention their service to country.
Economically developed countries such as Japan and France
have reached their positions in the absence of English. Their
vast human resource pool which wrought wonders in those
countries had no grounding in English.
On the contrary here we are still nursing a colonial
hangover. English continues to hang like a genie to intimidate
and discourage aspiring talent with the ‘Kaduwa’ mentality still
ingrained in a vast segment of our population.
This is not to deny the importance of English in today’s
technological driven society when the world is speeding along
the Information Super Highway opening new frontiers of knowledge
in an increasingly high tech world. English is the key to
accessing this new world.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa who has realised it’s importance
has propagated the teaching of English and IT knowledge to a
wide segment of the population. This project is still in it’s
initial stages and it is unfair to expect students in the rural
areas to have developed English language skills overnight,
particularly given their humble backgrounds.
Therefore it is prudent for this plan to be shelved at least
until such time a proper assessment is made of the success of
this program. In the meantime the authorities should train
English teachers of quality and competence who will be up to the
task.
We say this because English teaching is most schools have
dropped in standards. The mushrooming English tutories have
failed to step into the breach judging by the astounding failure
rate in English.
What is needed is a coordinated effort to popularise English
in the rural schools so that the subject would be attractive to
the pupils. The method of English teaching too should undergo
change with a more interactive form introduced.
Above all what is needed is to remove English from it’s label
as a status symbol so that our rural youth would embrace the
subject without intimidation or inferiority complex. This would
also erase divisions in society caused by English and make it a
common denominator of communications between all and sundry.
May be, the education authorities should reconsider their
decision to make a pass in English language a necessary
qualification for admission to GCE (A/L) classes. |