Poverty alleviation and a better quality of life
Priscilla WELIKALA
A definition of Poverty as given in the Webster’s Collegiate
Dictionary, is a state where one lacks a usual or socially acceptable
amount of money or material provisions.
A solution for this would be to ensure an adequate and continuous
flow of resources and this involves active participation of people
maximising their own strengths.
SAARC steps
Concern for Poverty alleviation has been a topic of much concern and
in the recent SAARC Summit declaration Poverty Alleviation is one main
area where Heads of State and their Governments will continue to “
Combat Poverty through all available means, including especially through
Peoples’ Empowerment”.
It is very creditable that such importance has been given, as a large
percentage of people are subject to Poverty in the region and even in
the World.
Now let us look at the existing Programs and Services for the poor
and whether they have contributed to Poverty Alleviation. It is very
important to look at these programs and their implementation for it
could be seen that these programs have contributed to alleviating some
of the problems poor people experience, but have they really contributed
to alleviating poverty, and finding solutions to situations poor people
face in life.
In the SAARC Declaration it is stated very rightly that they will
combat poverty especially through “People’s Empowerment”. This is very
important and the question is as to whether this is happening.
It is very important to understand that the anxiety and uncertainties
faced by the poor due to their unstable economic situation guide their
thinking and orientation and their worry is as to whether they will have
enough money for tomorrow instead of planning for their future.
Poverty creates not only a different lifestyle but a different
emotional set up as well. With such a frame of reference peoples
empowerment has to be done with much understanding. Paternalistic or
humanitarian policies will not activate people into action.
Empowerment
They can contribute to perpetuating dependency. People are a resource
and they must be strengthened socially and economically.
“Empowerment is a process by which disadvantaged people work together
to increase control over events that determine their lives.”
For this to happen the paradigm of working for people must change
towards working with people. This will need changes at policy level for
according to the present manner of service delivery the people become
eligible to get services based on various “inadequacies” they have.
e.g.: no source of income.
At time of service delivery what is strictly seen to is, as to
whether they fall in line with this set criteria and if they do, they
are provided with the services- financial or material assistance.
Provision of services alone will never move people out of poverty.
It is important to work with people, to move them from where they are
now to a situation where they would be enabled to live a better quality
of life or household well-being as a step by step process towards
poverty alleviation. The important question is as to whether any
attempts are made to effect this change within the people.
Moving people from where they are to a socially acceptable state of
house hold well- being or a better quality of life means trying to
effect changes within people who do not volunteer for change. Change
means moving people from the comfort of what they know into the unknown
area of work or some such activity which in the long run will benefit
them.
Reactions
There can be reactions to change such as resistance, anger, and
hostility. However provisions could be included when services are
delivered to impose certain consequences if they do not take steps to
improve their situation, and for these policy changes would be
necessary.
This is where working with people is important, to help them to build
trust and confidence to empower themselves to move out of their existing
“powerless” situation.
The workers engaged in service delivery need to work with people with
an understanding, and for this they must get the necessary training.
Mere delivery of services alone will not lead to poverty alleviation.
Of course there are certain groups of people who will need such
services, but for the most part people must be able to maximise their
strengths, enhance their potentials and work towards their development.
Another very important factor to consider and conceptually understand
is what we understand by poverty alleviation in our country.
Very often the success of programmes are reported by way of
distributing many things to the people such as sewing machines to make
use of for their economic enhancement or giving financial aid for micro
enterprises etc.
All these are good but what is very important is the follow up to see
how they are doing and if they have enhanced incomes, do they contribute
to a better quality of life or better household well being.
This is an area where much thought has to be given for we are working
with people who are in a particular frame of mind, having led a
different lifestyle due to various deprivations economically as well as
socially.
Changes
It should be possible to see specific and measurable changes in their
household well-being or quality of life as poverty Alleviation becomes a
reality. Quality of life or household well-being must be something
meaningful, appropriate and acceptable to the people.
It must be something achievable and those working with the people
must be able to influence these changes.
For Poverty Alleviation to be effective, there must be positive and
measurable changes contributing to a better quality of life or household
well-being through active participation of people. |