Daily News Online

DateLine Monday, 25 February 2008

News Bar »

    News: Forces advance continues in Mannar  ...            Political: Smooth run-up to Batti elections ...           Business: High tech reaches zenith ...            Sports: In-form Lankan juniors take on Kiwis today ...

Home

 | SHARE MARKET  | EXCHANGE RATE  | TRADING  | PICTURE GALLERY  | ARCHIVES | 

dailynews
 ONLINE


OTHER PUBLICATIONS


OTHER LINKS

Marriage Proposals
Classified
Government Gazette

There is something of the dawn about him


`
Democratic presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton participate in a debate in the Lyndon B. Johnson Auditorium at the University of Texas on February 21. Getty Images/AFP

One of the biggest international stories so far this year has been the rise and rise of Barack Obama. Its twin is the collapse of Hillary Clinton’s campaign. She now has the unmistakable air of a loser as the aura of inevitability and the mystique of invincibility give way to a scramble for relevance. Perhaps she is learning the meaning of the audacity of hope.

One former British politician said famously and damning of another that there was something of the night about him. There truly is something of the dawn about Obama. He has been able to shine light on the dark landscape of despair and self-doubt afflicting the country.

His launch of a presidential bid a year ago was indeed audacious, yet his vision of hope seems set to triumph over her claims of experience.

Hillary Clinton has lost what was her greatest asset a year ago - her aura of inevitability - leaving her campaign sputtering and imploding like a falling star while Obama is still building his head of steam.

Obama has momentum, money and media. Tellingly, all the television networks cut off Clinton in mid-sentence on Tuesday night in order to switch to Obama’s rousing rally speech when he declared “Houston, we have liftoff.”

He beat her by a margin of 17 points, 58-41. Astonishingly, that is the closest Clinton has come in his string of 10 galloping victories on the trot. Later the same night, in Hawaii, he beat her 76-24.

Obama’s margin over Clinton in Wisconsin was about the same as Senator John McCain’s over Governor Mike Huckabee (55-37). In other words, Clinton is as formidable a foe as Huckabee after McCain’s candidacy is assured.

What makes this even more memorable is that Wisconsin is her natural demographic turf: a preponderance of blue collar White voters in a State with a strong industrial base. It should have played to Ms Clinton’s core strengths: 60 per cent women, 90 per cent White, 40 per cent on income below $50,000, and almost 60 per cent without a college degree.

Instead, about the only reliable cohort left for Ms Clinton is White women over 65, who do not a majority make. He either led comfortably or pulled almost even with her in all other demographic groups.

She tried everything in Wisconsin. Her attacks on his eloquence make her sound small-minded. In a sure fire call on the losing candidate’s last card, she accused him of cowardice in not engaging in another debate.

He parried with the reminder of 18 debates already held and another two scheduled.

She accused him of plagiarism yet ducked the question of guaranteeing she had not lifted material from others, arguing that the charge was relevant only against Obama for he relied on words as his prime narrative, and therefore it mattered that the words were not his.

Most importantly, Clinton has become a prisoner of her own meta-narrative that has failed to excite the voters while Obama has tapped into a deep yearning for change from the politics of mutual destruction to one of a calling for a higher shared purpose.

By caricaturing any questioning of his naivete rooted in inexperience as an attack on hope-mongering - “they say I need to spend some more time in Washington so that I can be seasoned and stewed until the hope has been boiled out of me to prepare me for being President” - he turned around the charge. Ms Clinton became the wicked witch of the West bent on destroying hope. Yet the criticism of Obama being light on experience is not unfounded.

The problem for Clinton was worsened by her own fairytale claims of 35 years of experience.

This, to put it politely, is a stretch, both a numerical and terminological inexactitude.

Her one executive-level experience during Bill Clinton’s presidency was to be put in charge of healthcare reform which went down in flames.

Her management style contributed to the epic train wreck. As a Senator, her major legislative accomplishments seem to have been to rename post offices after sundry people. Even more tellingly, on a core issue with the party’s core constituency, namely Iraq, the boast of decades of experience was trumped by Obama claiming to have the right judgment.

Clinton’s inability to acknowledge and apologise for that mistake is doubly damaging. It underscores widely held perceptions of her as a focus group driven and calculating politician while reinforcing his claims as a conviction leader. And the tortured explanation, that she was wrong to trust George W. Bush, is disingenuous and undermines her entire claim to be ready to take charge on day one.

The experience-equals-competence meta-narrative has been disproved also with the ineptitude and turmoil engulfing Clinton’s campaign against the professionalism and self-assurance of the Obama express. Her entire organisational and financial effort was predicated on triumph by Super Tuesday on February 5. That night’s results marked the end.

The results of this Tuesday might mark the beginning of the end. Until Feb. 5, Clinton and Obama had duelled to a draw in their respective grand coalitions of women, the elderly, White blue collar workers and rural Democrats against African-Americans, young voters and the high income and educated Whites. Obama’s rout in Virginia and Maryland a week later showed the first cracks in Clinton’s coalition.

Wisconsin on Feb. 19 confirmed the cracks are widening, his demographic disadvantages are disappearing and Clinton is at risk of being deluged by Obamania.

Then there was the experience-equals-resilience argument (tested, vetted and investigated): tough enough to have beaten back numerous attacks from the Republicans. Voters show a hunger to move beyond this take-no-prisoners style of politics as a contact sport. And it once again reinforced her negative image as willing to say and do anything to recapture the White House.

When voters are warming to Mr. Obama’s promise of unifying the nation and healing the wounds, she guarantees divisiveness and polarisation from day one.

Clinton’s refusal to release tax returns and donors to her husband’s various activities added to the unease of voters about rolling the dice on another Clinton administration. And so they rejected the coronation of the Clintons option and embraced Obama’s call for change instead.

On electability, as McCain began to emerge as the presumptive Republican nominee, Clinton’s negatives came to the fore while Obama’s positives were accentuated. McCain’s experience in and of Washington politics is longer, genuine and more substantial than Clinton’s. Having run her entire primary on this meta-narrative, she could not change it in the election campaign.

Obama offers the starker alternative on Iraq. Clinton will lack credibility on national security and as commander-in-chief in waiting against a genuine war hero; Obama can change the storyline by emphasising judgment and the use of force against the real enemy, at the right time, in the right place.

In the latest opinion polls, on average Obama beats McCain by 5.5 points, Clinton loses by 4.5 points. In Wisconsin, Democratic voters believed, 63-37, that Obama is more likely than Clinton to beat McCain. Significantly, Obama received a total of 646,000 Wisconsin votes against 403,000 for all the Republican candidates combined.

Ironically, Obama’s campaign has relied on the insight of Karl Rove, the architect of President Bush’s victories.

Clinton’s strategy of triangulation has aimed to capture the middle ground.

But the pool of voters there is small and shrinking. Rove’s strategy was to energise the core Republican base (for which Clinton - any Clinton - as the opponent would be a gift).

Obama has done brilliantly in attracting new voters to the primaries and caucuses in record numbers - yet without losing independents and centrists.

Can Ohio and Texas revive Clinton’s campaign, or has she run out of time, arguments, money, primaries and even respect as she launches negative attacks ?

Obama leads her on votes: 10-9 million; on delegates count: 1187-1028, or 1360-1266 including committed super-delegates (using Real Clear Politics calculations); in national opinion polls: 46.0-41.8 on average; and in number of States won: 24-13. The average margin of his victory over Clinton in the last 10 successive wins, not weighting for populations, is 36.6 per cent.

He is sounding and looking increasingly presidential; she looks exhausted and sounds increasingly desperate. McCain clearly believes that Obama is pulling ahead.

Clinton’s choice is to withdraw with grace and humility and live to fight another day, or to go for a do-or-die scorched earth policy on March 4 and ruin her prospects of becoming an elder Senator aiming for a legacy of substantial legislative accomplishments.

Negative attacks and hints of convention skulduggery by Clinton reinforce her image of ruthlessness and win-at-any-price ambition. Negative attacks on Obama are deflected by decrying the same old politics of bar room brawling.

Obama’s uplifting cathartic speeches have been met by confused and continually shifting messages; the positive energy of “Yes we can” with the negative refrain of “No you can’t” (subtext: it’s my turn, you get back in line). Her performance in the Texas debate on Thursday night seemed to hint at a graceful valedictory concession - and earned her the night’s only standing ovation.

Ramesh Thakur is Distinguished Fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation and Professor of Political Science at the University of Waterloo

The Hindu

 

EMAIL |   PRINTABLE VIEW | FEEDBACK

Gamin Gamata - Presidential Community & Welfare Service
www.srilankans.com
Ceylinco Banyan Villas
www.news.lk
www.defence.lk
www.helpheroes.lk/
www.peaceinsrilanka.org
www.army.lk

| News | Editorial | Business | Features | Political | Security | Sport | World | Letters | Obituaries |

Produced by Lake House Copyright © 2006 The Associated Newspapers of Ceylon Ltd.

Comments and suggestions to : Web Editor