Govt committed to promote and protect human rights
U.N. Human Rights High Commissioner Louise Arbour meeting
President Mahinda Rajapaksa at Temple Trees recently.
Pic. by Chandana Perera. |
Statement by Prasad Kariyawasam, Permanent Representative of Sri
Lanka to the United Nations at the Third Committee, 62nd Session of
the General Assembly of the United Nations New York, on Promotion
and Protection of Human Rights
At the outset, let me thank the High Commissioner for Human
Rights for her report to this Committee, and for the useful visit
she undertook earlier this month to Sri Lanka at the invitation of
the Government. I would also like to thank representatives of UN
special mechanisms who briefed the Committee under this item of the
agenda.
In this context, we like to share with the Committee, information
on ongoing progress in Sri Lanka, as well as challenges that we
continue to encounter in our persistent efforts to promote and
protect human rights, in accordance with our constitutional and
treaty obligations, using national and international means.
Government efforts to promote and protect the rule of law and
human rights are taking place under difficult and trying
circumstances due to the continuing terrorist campaign against
civilians, as well as Government and civilian assets, by one of the
most ruthless terrorist groups in the world and their relentless
propaganda and lobbying aimed at tarnishing the image of the
Government.
Nevertheless, we observe that several references to Sri Lanka by
some delegations as well as one Special Rapporteur were based on a
situation that exists no more.
It is unfortunate that these views have failed to take into
consideration or acknowledge positive developments that have taken
place in the recent past, when the Government took resolute and
proactive action against a few aberrations in the protective regime
of human rights already available for our citizens.
Some comments also seem to have disregarded or overlooked the
Government’s active engagement with the Office of the High
Commissioner for Human Rights that include joint efforts to
identify, fund, and implement mutually acceptable initiatives
supportive of more effective human rights protection in my country;
as well as our continuous engagement with several other UN special
mechanisms.
Sri Lanka is one of the oldest democracies in our part of the
world. Hence successive regularly elected Governments have been, and
continue to be mindful, and value the principle of government
accountability and responsibility to her people.
In this context we have freely undertaken international legal
obligations by becoming party to all the core human rights
conventions. Apart from fulfilling reporting obligations to those
treaty bodies, the Government remains committed to sharing
information with all human rights mechanisms on a voluntary basis.
In addition, as a member of the Human Rights Council, the human
rights situation in Sri Lanka will be reviewed under the Universal
Periodic Review mechanism at the UPR Working Group Meeting scheduled
for early next year.
We have thus opened ourselves to scrutiny of multiple
international mechanisms on the basis of our belief that openness
and accountability, through international means, can strengthen
national efforts.
As a clear manifestation of this tradition of openness and
commitment to work with international human rights mechanisms,
President Mahinda Rajapaksa extended an invitation to the High
Commissioner for Human Rights Madam Louise Arbour to visit Sri
Lanka, when the President met with her in Geneva in June this year.
Invitations were also extended to the Special Rapporteur on
torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment, Manfred Nowak; and Representative of the
Secretary-General on Internally Displaced Persons, Walter Kalin.
Both Madam Arbour and Mr Nowak have completed their visits, while Mr
Kalin is scheduled to visit Sri Lanka later this year.
As High Commissioner Arbour herself stated in response to a
question raised in this Committee by a delegate on October 24, the
Government facilitated her interaction with a wide cross section of
persons in Sri Lanka during her visit, ranging from government
officials to opposition political party leaders, representatives of
civil society, religious dignitaries, and a number of independent
individuals.
It was ensured that the High Commissioner’s meetings with civil
society took place without the presence of Government or security
officials, thereby enabling her to interact freely.
The High Commissioner raised several issues on which the
Government has already initiated action. For instance, the
Government has made arrangements to shortly introduce a Witness and
Victim Assistance and Protection Act in Parliament as an urgent
Bill.
A Parliamentary Select Committee is in the process of finalizing
its report with regard to the 17th amendment to the Constitution,
which would strengthen the effective functioning of national human
rights mechanisms. With regard to investigation and prosecution, the
Government has initiated action on many fronts.
And we remain actively engaged with the Office of the High
Commissioner for Human Rights in seeking technical advice and
support in order to re-invigorate and strengthen capacities of our
local institutional framework for the better protection of the human
rights of all our citizens.
This would include enhancing independent and credible national
monitoring and reporting mechanisms, which would address a concern
expressed by the High Commissioner regarding the lack of reliable
and authoritative information on credible allegations of human
rights abuses.
We expect that OHCHR officers currently in Sri Lanka with the UN
country team will now work with our national authorities towards
this objective. We are mindful that to succeed in the long run, it
is primarily the responsibility of the State to develop home grown
national capacities to protect its citizens.
Sri Lanka’s commitment to a policy of openness and eagerness to
work with the international community has often been abused by the
terrorist group operating in my country and misused by its lobbyists
based abroad. In this regard we are surprised by several
unreasonable assumptions and unjustified demands by some, seemingly
based on hearsay and politically motivated lobbying efforts of
interested parties.
Nevertheless we remain open for rational persuasion and will
continue to work with the international community to obtain support
for our initiatives and aims in protecting human rights.
It is this open engagement with the international community, and
willingness to listen to constructive advice, which made the
Government establish an International Independent Group of Eminent
Persons (IIGEP), a unique mechanism, to observe the work of the
Commission of Inquiry which was set up at the national level to
investigate into alleged abductions, disappearances, and extra
judicial killings.
As we discuss international treaties and mechanisms established
to uphold human rights, we, as a country that benefits immensely
from inward remittances of migrant workers, are disturbed by the
present lack of attention to the issue of human rights of migrant
workers in the international human rights agenda.
In this regard we are surprised that some, who otherwise champion
civil and political rights worldwide, have chosen to turn a blind
eye to the plight of this important segment of humanity.
As a result, ratification of the “Convention on the Protection of
all Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families” remains far below
expectations.
Some States seem to hold the view that international agreements
like the Convention on Migrant Workers could interfere with their
respective domestic migration policies. However, this assertion
seems contrary to their views on other treaties that they promote on
civil and political rights.
It is our duty, to ensure that rights of migrant workers are
given equal priority. In our interdependent world that values
freedom, rights and dignity of the individual, it is essential that
we make the International Convention on Migrant Workers also a truly
universal instrument and ensure that migrant workers, irrespective
of where they live and where they come from, are guaranteed their
human rights.
We appeal to all in this Committee to adopt a well informed,
balanced, and reasonable approach to all situations, wherever they
occur, including in my country, so that we can improve and protect
all human rights of all people, wherever they live and in all
circumstances.