A commendable gesture
The appeal by Prime Minter
Ratnasiri Wickramanayaka to the LTTE cadres trapped in the East
to lay down their arms and surrender should be viewed in a
positive light notwithstanding the reservations in the minds of
many.
Now that the LTTE has been routed in the East the Government
would do well to speed up the development process in the
Province and for this to succeed it is important that all
irritants be removed.
Hence the Premier’s invitation to the LTTEers to share in the
development process while at the same time continuing with the
Government’s military thrust to flush out pockets of Tiger
resistance.
This invitation will no doubt be hailed as a magnanimous
gesture by the pacifists while others would want the Government
not to provide any respite to an outfit that has caused so much
bloodshed and misery in the country. The Government we are sure
will weigh the pros and cons of the issue.
In this regard, one is reminded of the grand show of
surrendering weapons made by the LTTE during the time of the
Indo-Lanka accord.
Judging by huge volumes of arms surrendered including heavy
weapons there were those who genuinely believed that the outfit
had at last renounced the path of violence. How wrong this
notion proved to be was demonstrated in subsequent events.
The Government cannot be faulted for offering an amnesty to a
rebel outfit. Such a gesture was seen during the 1971 insurgency
when the then Government offered an amnesty to the JVP rebels
fighting the State to lay down their arms and surrender with a
promise of rehabilitation.
How successful that programme was could be gauged by the fact
that many who underwent rehabilitation later joined mainstream
politics and even entered Parliament as MPs. Besides in almost
all trouble spots in the World today we read of Government
leaders offering similar amnesties to rebel outfits to mend
their ways.
Of course the JVP insurrection cannot be compared to the
LTTE’s violent separatist campaign. The latter is fighting for a
separate state posing a threat to the country’s sovereignty
unlike the JVP which only sought to topple a Government.
One has to take into account the number of conscripts in the
LTTE ranks, including child soldiers, who may want to make a
bolt for it if there is guarantee of security and a secure life.
In fact, there have been many a case of LTTE cadres seeking the
protection of the Security Forces. Some of them have been
reunited with their families.
It is these elements that needs to be convinced of the
Government’s genuine desire to provide them with a new
beginning. The surrender should be followed by genuine attempts
to heal their battle scars. The Government should spell out a
proper a programme of action that would be both safe and
attractive to them.
Any such programme should include counselling and ways of
banishing the suspicions that marked relations between the two
communities leading to the present conflict. This should be
followed by a programme to ensure their economic emancipation
and eventual absorption into society as equal partners.
The amnesty offer of course should not detract from the
Government’s current campaign to rid the menace of LTTE
terrorism which it has so far carried out with resounding
success belying the charges made against it.
No less a personage than the Mahanayake of Malwatte the other
day made a statement debunking the logic by the opposition of a
Government complicity with the LTTE.
The Venerable Mahanayake asked whether the Government could
secure such frequent military victories if it indeed had
compromised itself to the outfit.
What is well known is that the Government has invited the
LTTE to the negotiating table. It is the LTTE which walked away
from all previous peace talks and began the cycle of violence.
But the door is still open for the group to mend its ways.
Perhaps the amnesty offer will also spur the LTTE leadership to
assess the viability of their goal and enter the negotiations
process. |