EU leads clamour for carbon cuts after UN climate report
UNITED STATES: Europe led demands for a deal to slash global
greenhouse gas emissions after the UN’s top scientific panel on Friday
said early, deep cuts could avert long-term climate damage — and at a
modest cost.
In a statement shortly after the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) published its report, EU Environment Commissioner Stavros
Dimas called for a breakthrough in efforts to shape a successor to the
Kyoto Protocol.
“Negotiations on a new global climate change agreement must be
launched at the next UN ministerial conference in December,” Dimas said.
“It is now time for the rest of the international community to follow
our lead and commit to ambitious reduction targets.”
The 27 EU countries have vowed to cut their emissions of
heat-trapping carbon gases by 20 percent by 2020, compared to 1990
levels. It has offered to deepen this to 30 percent if other major
polluters follow suit.
The IPCC report, released in Bangkok Friday, laid out a menu of
options for limiting emissions, adding that cleaner fuels, more
efficient technology and confirmed policy options were all available for
achieving this goal.
Under one of its scenarios, to keep warming to 2.0-2.4 C (3.6-4.3 F)
over pre-industrial times, emissions would have to peak by 2015 and
reduce to 50-85 percent of 2000 levels by 2050. Yet the cost would shave
only around 0.12 percentage points off annual global economic growth.
The Kyoto Protocol, the only global agreement that sets specific
targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, expires at the end of
2012.
Talks on renewing the deal are under way, with the next big round
scheduled to take place on the Indonesian resort island of Bali in
December.
But progress faces two big stumbling blocks — the absence of the
United States, the world’s No.1 polluter, from the present treaty; and
the reluctance of China, India, Brazil and other big developing
countries to be drawn into promising targeted emissions cuts.
Under the present Kyoto format, only industrialised countries, which
are most to blame for global warming, make these pledges.
Germany, which is current president of the EU and Group of Eight
(G8), on Friday said the IPCC report showed “climate catastrophe is not
inevitable. We can prevent it.”
“It’s important that we set the right course at the climate
conference in Bali. Science has done its work, now politics must do its
work,” said Environment Minister Sigmar Gabriel.
The head of Kyoto
’s parent organisation said the Bangkok report clearly showed climate
change could be addressed at a reasonable cost.
“We can tackle the issue, limit and reduce the CO2 emissions without
destroying the world economy,” Yvo de Boer, the head of the UN Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), told a press conference in
Berlin.
“The report gives a very encouraging signal that we have at our
disposal the technologies. With these options we have a chance of
preventing some of the most catastrophic scenarios,” de Boer said.
In contrast, the rhetoric in Washington was low-key and businesslike.
The US government voiced support for the IPCC document as a report
that would help policymakers “make more informed decisions” and said the
United States had been an “active and constructive participant” in
Bangkok. It gave no indicator as to whether Washington would shift its
opposition to emissions caps, which the EU champions.
Green groups, meanwhile, seized on the IPCC report as confirmation
that carbon pollution could be tackled affordably.
Stephan Singer, European head of climate and energy with the
conservation organisation WWF, said the report showed “for the first
time that stopping climate pollution in a very ambitious way does not
cost a fortune.”
“There is no excuse for any government to argue that it is going to
cause their economy to collapse,” he said.
Washington, Friday, AFP |