Gajaman Puvatha: A symbolic satire
Review: Dr. Senarath TENNAKOON
DRAMA: Dayananda Gunawardena, the pioneer of the Sri Lankan docu-drama
style dramatic tradition, produced Gajaman Puvatha, Ananda Javanika and
Madura Javanika.
He faced enormous difficulties and challenges while searching for
historical data sources and context development for imaginatively
creating these dramas. Of these the most researched, experimented and
significant is none other than Gajaman Puvatha.
Gajaman Puvatha was first staged on 14 October 1975. It was
encouragingly accepted and appreciated by the drama audience.
After a lapse of nearly three decades, it has returned to the Sri
Lankan stage despite the untimely demise of its creator. His son
Wasantha together with the former cream of the cast has efficiently
handled the task of re-staging Gajaman Puvatha. Indeed, there are a few
inclusions among the cast. The performances of the veterans vie with one
another.
The characterization of Gajaman Nona, Elapatha Mudali and John Doyle
as to their human nature and relationships is a sublime task. They are
not stock characters. Gajaman Nona and Ranchagoda Lamaya are contrasting
characters. Ranchagoda Lamaya itself is a sub plot illuminating the
contrast between the two poetesses.
Political power
The setting is local and regional within this country. A rapidly
changing colonial political situation is narrated. The Dutch were giving
way to the English. This flux and transfer of political power are aptly
exposed in the eight acts of the drama.
Aspects of dialogue take two key forms - prose and verse. Language is
the principal medium in the play. The play itself is a microcosm of
elegant, powerful, enchanting language application. It is highly
creative and exuberantly poetic. It is not day-to-day common language.
In particular the poetic forms with heavy use of metaphor,
alliteration and rhyme, power packed with rhetoric beauty, emotive
force, varying dialects and syntacic-semantic vitality are educative to
many a linguistic novice.
Dramatic effects are the most significant, relevant and epoch-making
in the dramatic tradition. The main conflict pivots around the so-called
friendship between Gajaman Nona and Elapatha Mudali. Both are competent
poets.
But Elapatha Mudali nursed a sensual soft feeling for Gajaman Nona.
She did not dislike him. In fact she appears to have encouraged his
pursuits. But she once declared that she liked him because of his
poetry.
The other conflicting areas of interest are the conflict between the
Dutch rulers and Gajaman Nona's father, between Gajaman Nona and
Ranchagoda Lamaya and that between John Doyle and the British rulers.
Moments of emotional tension and suspense are inbuilt in Gajaman Puvatha.
The best situation is that produced by Elapatha Mudali breaking in at
midnight to meet Gajaman Nona when she is in an emotionally distressed
situation because of her father being engaged in a life threatening task
(catching wild elephants). Elapatha Mudali being intoxicated with
sensual feelings behaves like a sex pervert.
Poetic discourses
Dramatic irony is adequately presented in the poetic discourses
between Gajaman Nona and Elapatha Mudali. A comic effect on the audience
and a tragic effect on Elapatha Mudali are created when Gajaman Nona
says, "Mudlier, we shall confine our love to poetry only", in Act 4.
The stage effects of a technical nature, costumes and music etc are
additions to Gajaman Puvatha in making it a docu-drama par excellence.
The entire play is based on ideas, discourses, and debates-some in prose
and some in verse.
Essentially the drama appears to be a combination of the three main
types of comedy, history and tragedy, with accent on history and
tragedy. Towards the end of the drama, the audience builds a sense of
pathos at the plight of Gajaman Nona.
Gajaman Nona signifies the present day artist living under difficult
socio-economic conditions; being a victim of the vicissitudes of
fortune. Gajaman Puvatha is a symbolic satire on the unkind, harsh and
insecure socio-economic millieu of the Sri Lankan artist.
|