Sampur - striking the proper liberal note
SAMPUR: Many of us are just now taking in the full meaning of the
security forces' success in taking over of Sampur. There is cause for
justified satisfaction at the success of the operation to dislodge the
LTTE from Sampur, both militarily and in terms of the welfare of the
people of the area, till then now held in thrall by the LTTE.
The first military success in the past five years by the Sri Lankan
security forces, and the reassertion of the government's writ in an area
the LTTE had blatantly taken control in gross violation of the Ceasefire
Agreement, is certainly cause for much satisfaction. There is also the
relative safety the success at Sampur has provided to the Trincomalee
port, which will remain a key target of the LTTE.
Government special forces commandos travel in an armoured vehicle
in the town of Sampur on September 07, after capturing the area
from LTTE guerrillas. AFP
|
The LTTE's retreat from Sampur, whether or not it is a strategic
retreat as tiger propagandists state, has certainly eased the pressure
on Trincomalee and the vital sea lanes of the East. It is important that
all sections of the Armed Forces share in the credit of this successful
operation.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, announcing of the military success at
Sampur at the SLFP's 55th annual convention earlier this week, did
strike the proper note. He was not carried away by the military success
nor was he unaware of the other implications that this success would
have on the minds of the people, who were firmly behind the government
and the Armed Forces on this important exercise.
Although the President won applause from the audience when he broke
the news of the capture of Sampur to the country from the podium at the
SLFP sessions, he was sagacious in how he announced it.
He said: "Our Armed Forces have captured Sampur for the welfare and
benefit of the people living there". The President struck the proper
note in combining the aim of the welfare and benefit of the people of
Sampur together with the military success.
The message he gave was that although it was an important military
success, what was uppermost in the mind of the government was the
welfare and benefit of the people of Sampur. He has already been proved
correct by the large numbers returning to live under the protection of
the Sri Lankan security forces in Sampur and Muttur.
No sooner had the President announced the success at Sampur, he made
another timely and necessary statement. He said: "As I always state,
what we are engaged in is not a war, but a retaliatory response to
attacks carried out on us".
This was most timely in the context of repeated statements from
various quarters, that the operation at Sampur was an inevitable move
towards war. It was heartening to hear the President temper his
announcement of the success at Sampur with reiteration that this was no
act of war or no invitation to it, but a response to hostile actions by
the LTTE.
It would do well for those who take delight in singing the praise of
the hugely flawed CFA to see how the LTTE had violated it with impunity
in establishing its positions of control in Sampur, which had been
clearly identified as area under government control.
What the operation at Sampur did was to set right that major wrong,
conveniently ignored by the UNP government of Ranil Wickremesinghe,
December 2001 to November 2003, and later by President Chandrika
Kumaratunga from November 2003 till November 17, 2005 when they
controlled defence.
One must recall that the threat posed to the Trincomalee port and key
civilian installations in the peripheral area by the LTTE's build up at
Sampur, were highlighted by the late Foreign Minister Lakshman
Kadirgamar, as part of the LTTE's dangerous violations of the CFA,
albeit to no effective response from those in charge of defence at the
time.
Notes in sync
If President Rajapaksa struck the proper note in announcing success
at Sampur, he continued to speak in the proper vein throughout his
speech at the SLFP convention. It was speech marked for statesmanship in
his handling of several subjects.
In its essence he spoke of the need for national unity, not in terms
of empty phrases, but with concrete examples of the need to shed the
blinkers of race, ethnicity and division that continue to blind many to
the realities before us.
It is unfortunate that many of the published English reports of this
speech by the President's did not carry some of the core elements of
what he said. I shall therefore state here what he said in Sinhala on
some important matters.
On narrow thinking with regard to religion and school attended in
picking competent persons for high office he said: "As we were taking of
the success of the Armed Forces, I will relate one incident. At the time
when a certain service chief was to be appointed, some persons told me
about his religion.
Some told me about his school. Some told me about statements made by
his father. Some showed me these reports and asked me not to make this
appointment. I asked Defence Secretary Gotabhaya for his views about
this officer. He said this officer was the most capable and suitable. I
accepted this observation with the highest consideration.
Not only did we acknowledge his capability, but it has led to new
expectations in the battlefield." It was not different to identify the
choice of the present Air Force Commander.
In further explanation of recognizing competence the President said:
"We handed over the Army to General Fonseka who was due to go on
retirement. That is the secret of victory. The way forward is by giving
due place to those who are capable and most suitable. What I always say
about our party too is that it is not only the Bandaranaike's and
Rajapaksa's who are suited to lead this party".
The liberal note
At a time when divisive trends along communal and religion lines are
strong, and with many attempts to portray him an extremist or Sinhala
chauvinist, the observations he made about the rights of communities
other than Sinhala are significant.
This is what he said: "Friends, we [the SLFP] carry the
responsibility of making this country a land where people of Sinhala,
Tamil and Muslim ethnicity and Buddhist, Hindu, Christian and Islamic
faiths can live in peace. For this purpose, if there is the need for
changes to our administrative and political structures, they should be
implemented without any delay. That is what I repeatedly state about a
Sri Lankan model for our political structures.
It is necessary to have a structure where all people will participate
in governance. While we respond to terrorists in the language they
understand, it is also necessary to comprehend the language that is
understood by the ordinary people.
"Not every Tamil is an LTTE-er. Some of us have such a misconception.
When they look at innocent Tamil people, what strikes their eye is the
image of a Tiger. This is entirely wrong. Are those opposed to terrorism
such as Lakshman Kadirgamar, Anandasangaree, and Douglas Devananda who
is over there, not Tamil people? Do we not have many Tamil officers who
serve with dedication in the Armed Forces? Those who hold the second and
third positions of command in the Air Force are from the Tamil
community.
Do they not perform their duty by their country? We should respect
this reality. If this difference cannot be understood, we will fall into
grave difficulty."
Thus in his first address to an SLFP convention as its leader,
President Rajapaksa laid down the ground rules of liberalism and social
democracy which he expects the party to follow.
They were the principles on which the party was founded by the late
SWRD Bandaranaike, DA Rajapaksa, H. Sri Nissanka and others. He has
struck the correct note in the larger national context. |