![](Spice.jpg)
Light at the edge of the world
"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses,
yearning to breathe free" - Statue of Liberty
Jayantha Senevirathna
MIGRATION: I can't exactly remember whether it was Omar
Sheriff who commanded the ship, which crushed onto a craggy coastline
lured by pirates. The film was a real cliffhanger and, as usual, ended
with a happy note as someone fired up the gas lamps at the lighthouse on
the edge of a cliff path.
So it paved the way for a safe journey for the captain and the crew.
Inspired by such thrills and horrors of a film full of adventure, we had
always been dreaming of travelling round the world by ship in our youth.
At last the dream has come true for one of our colleagues. This time
he was not in love of adventure, but in love of wealth. Boarded on a
ship, with over 60 passengers, his destination was Italy. With rusting
hulks, the ship looked quite capable of sinking unassisted.
![](z_p21-spice1.jpg)
Statue of Liberty
|
And a terrifying ride through rough seas followed, surviving fierce
storms, pirates hunting after, unending diets of fish and salty water
and finally a rude awaking at gunpoint from Italian border patrol
intercepting.
Pretending a change of course, they anchored at a distance. And,
again, risking death in the dark, they tried to sneak into Italian
shores amidst gunfire, and this time, swimming blindly towards a faint
light on the shore.
He didn't know how many were able to escape, but he feels happy now.
Given a shelter by some friendly Italian villagers, after a few weeks,
he vanished into thin air. Another illegal economic migrant is looking
for work.
But this is not always the case for the majority of would be illegal
migrants. The penalties for failure is so devastating that thousands of
them perish to death inside a container, at the back of a truck, failing
to cope with rough seas or get shot dead when crossing a border. But the
stream pours still, millions of men and women from the poor part of the
world struggling for hire, risking their precious lives.
According to reports, human traffickers usually charge around a
million in rupees from a would be traveller before get him on board in
their rusty old ships. And, a capital of one million rupees suggests an
adequate investment for a calculated venture. It's enough for a young
energetic entrepreneur to embark on a project on his home soil and win.
Even though economic gains pose as the major attraction for
migration, there are other factors that attract them too. It may be a
peaceful environment, growing economy, health care, political stability
and more opportunities for education that tempt them towards foreign
shores.
![](z_p21-spice2.jpg)
RISKING LIFE: Terrifying ride through rough seas
|
When we put the rich world's wealth into context, people we would
consider wealthy in the poor part of this world are materially worse off
than poor people in the richer part of the world.
For that reason, even if the migrants live in penury in such a
country, they are relatively richer than their compatriots back home.
That is the most striking factor, which balances your thoughts when you
are trying to make up your mind to risk your life on the most perilous
journey of all.
But are they really happy and safe in their newfound havens? Their
experiences at home and abroad could hardly be less similar. At home,
finding enough to eat is a daily struggle, and a dull and routine
clerical work in a government department is a lucky break. At abroad,
they do not have to starve, but being an illegal migrant carries a sort
of stigma. Where would they expect to be happier?
Even though hard up, you enjoy the respect that a decent citizen
receives in all societies at home. You are with your compatriots and
take part in all kinds of social interactions even under the toughest of
conditions. Though outwardly happy, a migrant is well aware how locals
see people like himself.
Officials representing migration department may be very impolite and
harsh. Locals berate politicians for allowing you into their country.
Their fears and sense of grievance that you are there to spoil their
chances are unnerving.
In reality, the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand invited people
with marketable skills even before globalization came into effect. They
are countries that are built on immigration. Migrants were there on
invitation and the land's extent and abundant resources ensured
prosperity to the nation and to the self.
And, the common man accepted the idea that newcomers add to economic
strength and cultural interest. But in Europe, Japan, Korea and Taiwan
immigration is new and societies are less receptive to change. But, like
it or not, such countries also offer ideal conditions for a hopeful
immigrant - a life free of danger, corruption, and the hope for the
children together with an immense earning potential.
Immigration in itself is a force of globalization. It is impossible
to separate the globalization of trade and capital from the global
movement of people. It is common knowledge that the market for top
talent is global and competitive, and, as a result, developed countries
redesigned their migration policies, not just to admit, but actively to
attract highly skilled immigrants.
Like the USA, some other countries have already introduced green card
systems of their own for information technology staff. But, proving that
there is a scarcity, the required numbers of technology professionals
are not turning up. In the richer part of the world, it is conventional
wisdom to invite skilled people early. The skilled get the preference
everywhere.
But unskilled also stands a good chance. In richer parts of the
world, the electorate is wealthy and well educated, but the work force
is aging. There are lots of jobs for the hard workers which the locals
have little appetite. Therefore, the unskilled, our boat people, are not
a big problem at lower levels of the service sector, shops, factories or
in industrial labour.
Unskilled workers are welcome but they are a problem for the ordinary
citizens, the voters. They know that immigration threatens their living
standards, and, fear for their future as the flow of immigrants seems to
be out of control.
The richer part of the world needs both the skilled and unskilled as
well. On the one hand, top talent and competitive skills are vital to
maintain a competitive edge with the increasing forces of globalization,
and on the other, unskilled labour is indispensable for an aging economy
where the countrymen hate work at the lower end of the skills spectrum.
So, those with marketable skills often leave the poor part of the
world as soon as they graduate, and the unskilled is also looking for
places where their labour is in demand.
According to a research paper, freeing migration is as powerful a
measure towards wealth, as freeing trade. There are millions of jobs for
unskilled workers in the rich world. But, if a migrant is there to stay,
the voters consider them as disruptive elements.
Like us, they also get annoyed at odd languages, strange smells,
clothing, cultures, etc. The social transformation that immigrants
create generates a lot of resentment in the minds of the voters.
The customs, foods, ideas and new ways of doing things may easily be
looked down upon. As a result, immigration meets confrontations from
voters in the rich world. So there would be political costs for
governments, which are in favour of letting in professional talent and
cheap labour to their countries.
For them, if the labour-intensive levels of the service sector are
function smoothly, they need millions of migrants as workers. For
example, when law enforcement authorities' press on employers, they
simply inform them that without illegal migrants their outputs would
perish in the end.
So in complying with such economic forces at work, employers rarely
corporate with the law enforcement authorities to curb illegal
immigrants. The demand is so high, and the supply should be constant if
the economy is to grow. It is difficult to control.
So with the blessings of the employers, borders will always leak, as
they want more staff. And, in the richer parts of the world, it is their
own economic needs that undermine their own restrictions on illegal
migrants. Apart from such favourable situations abroad, the fall in
transport costs is also making it cheaper to risk a trip, and cheap
communication also inform would be immigrants of the jobs available.
So the government could help the boat people who want to provide
just-in-time labour in the richer part of the world. They must be
informed that there are enough opportunities available to migrate as a
legal migrant.
Western governments are not that harsh on economic migrants now.
There are programmes to inform the voters that migration is under
control, they would be easily integrated into their cultures. And, all
the immigrants are not there to stay. They would come back after a
desired period. Governments are ready to exploit the flexibility and
employability that economic migrants contribute.
Would be migrants should be informed that they stand a definite
chance if they can prove that they can integrate smoothly into the new
cultures. So they would think twice before risking their lives at
borders and seas while trying to cross over to the USA, in the Indian
Ocean down under, in the rough seas of Mediterranean or in the jails of
Japan or Korea. |