Insights into globalisation and neo-liberalism
Professor Sunanda Mahendra
LITERATURE: Dr. Fidel Castro Ruz, the President of Cuba turned
80 this year, and quite a number of books have been launched to mark the
occasion. Many books are published on the various issues raised by Dr
Castro from time to time via lectures, key note addresses, and messages
over the years.
Being a long-time Sri Lankan scholar on the subject, the senior
journalist and the Sri Lanka National Committee for Solidarity with Cuba
president Jayatilleke de Silva has compiled some of Castro's speeches on
the subject of globalisation and neo-liberalism, which presumably will
help some of our own counterparts in the field of political sciences and
allied subjects to acquire more knowledge and information.
According to the compiler, the subject or the concept of
globalisation is an objective historical process, which is irreversible,
and he quotes Dr. Castro: "the problem is not globalisation per se, but
rather the type of globalisation." Having laid down this statement,
Castro makes an attempt to look at the concept from various points of
view.
In a lecture delivered at the Central University of Venezuela,
February 3, 1999, he further clarified the clear definition in these
words: "in our view, globalisation is nobody's whim, It is not even
anybody's invention. Globalisation is a law of history. It is a
consequence of the development of productive forces.
It is a consequence of scientific and technological development, so
much so that even the author of this phrase Karl Marx, who had great
confidence in human talent, possibly was unable to imagine it. Certain
other things remind me of some of the basic ideas of that thinker among
great thinkers.
It comes to one's mind that even what he conceived as an ideal for
human society could never come true and this is increasingly clear if it
was not in a globalised world" [p1].
Then he tries to juxtapose the basic view on neo-liberalism, as
connected to globalisation as follows.
Private property
"The concept or the force, neo-liberal globalisation wants to turn
all countries, especially all our countries [special emphasis is laid on
the third world countries here] into private property.
What will be left for us of their enormous resources? They have
accumulated an immense wealth, not only looting and exploiting the
world, but also working in the miracle alchemists longed for in the
middle ages turning paper into gold.
At the same time they have turned gold into paper and with it buy
everything, everything but souls-more accurately said-everything but the
overwhelming majority of souls. They buy natural resources, factories,
whole communication systems, service, and so on.
They are buying even land around the world assuming that being
cheaper than in their own countries. It is a good investment for the
future."
One would wonder how well, thought and how well expressed on the
global observation, especially as applied to the third world conditions.
Castro then underlines how he, with his colleagues, managed to
safeguard the interests of their land, with a political vision of their
own, as against evil forces and combated to the point that he had the
greatest challenge from his enemy countries, where capitalism
flourished.
In a tone of irony, he says we must ponder over these matters
scientifically, and reach our own conclusions, rather than depending on
others' ideologies, and as such obviously, it is reasonable for people
to have food, health, a roof over their heads, clothing and education
plus adequate rational sustainable and secure transportation means,
culture recreation, and a broad variety of options and many more things
aspired as human beings, perhaps a private jet or a yacht depending on
the social and economic conditions affordable.
Castro states of his finding amusing some of the writings of the
so-called political thinkers, who theorize the concepts of globalisation
and neo-liberalism connected to it, as they possess contradictions in
the ultimate analysis.
He selects one such contribution from a prolific contributor on the
subject [George Soros: Global Crisis], and states that the book that
theorizes may not help address the issues of globalisation, and neo
liberalism in the best possible perspective.
Broader perspective
He too emphasises that though the private property holders, who have
made some of the countries look rich but from a broader perspective they
can cause an economic catastrophe to the rest of the world in terms of
enormous sums of money saved from loans from banks. In this direction he
makes mention of the case of Bill Gates as an example, who had obtained
loans from fifty banks [p9].
In his addresses he makes the reader feel that the great richness may
mean from another standpoint a factor of destabilisation caused through
the plunder and exploitation, and as such, from his point of view, the
richest countries are setting rules and requirements that better suit
them and look forward to the day when they are free from taxes and
tariffs.
One of the eye opening concepts being the facts he lays down in terms
of third world conditions, where the people are driven to a form of
modern slavery, the cheap-man-power flooding the free trade zones in
their own lands, and the introduction of worst paid salaries at the
maximum consumerism levels [p.17].
With these as the background, Castro introduces a dialogue, essential
to realize the globalisation's potential [in an address to the
ministerial meeting of the group of 77, Havana September 19,1999]. He
states that globalisation is the historical process that defines the
world scenario, as this millennium draws to an end.
He emphasizes that globalisation is an irreversible reality
characterized by the growing interaction of all countries in the world,
their economies and peoples.
In his opinion, major scientific and technical advances have
shortened distances and allowed for direct communication and
transmission of information among countries located anywhere on the
planet [p19].
But this situation, according to his observation and the analysis, is
linked with the neo-liberal policies that impose unregulated markets and
unbridled privatisation.
Thus he says that far from promoting the expansion of development
throughout an increasingly interdependent world, badly in need of
sharing the progresses achieved, neo-globalisation has aggravated
existing inequality raised to inordinate heights social inequities and
the most irritating contrasts between extreme wealth and extreme
poverty.[19]
Then Castro builds up the theory that while globalisation is an
objective reality neo-liberalism is a disaster [in his speech at the
opening session of the South Summit on April 12,2000 in Havana].
It is interesting to note that some of the sayings of Castro have
gone down the history as epoch-making utterances and revolutionary
visions. One is 'homeland or death'; the other, 'we either unite and
establish close cooperation or we die'.
The last speech, included in the collection, is an insight into the
conditions existing in the third world, where the factors of
unemployment, the comparison of consumer levels in the first world and
the third world, and factors that lead to hunger and starvation.
Summarising, he says that hunger continues to be a daily reality for
852 million people, while trillions of dollars are spent on weapons that
kill the hungry, and not hunger; extremely thought provoking and
refreshing.
This compilation helps the reader transcend the narrow barriers of
political thinking.
[email protected] |