I can well appreciate the reluctance of a Government installed by the
electoral process, not wishing to incur the displeasure of influential
Trade Unions. But is that a good enough reason to allow the public to be
held to ransom by Government doctors and the railway and postal
employees.
The same goes for employees of the Government funded Corporations
such as the CEB, Port and Petroleum. It behoves the highest judiciary in
the land to step in and bail out the Government by banning strikes of
public servants and employees of Government funded Corporations.
The Indian Supreme Court has very recently done precisely this, so
why not in Sri Lanka? A new machinery however, needs to be put in place,
to enable the workers to have their grievances adjudicated
expeditiously.
SIDAT SRI NANDALOCHANA, Colombo 4.
Thanks to the mass media we were able to the see on our TV screens
the violence that erupted at the inaugural sessions of the CMC.
The pertinent question is: how does one view this type of behaviour
by the new MMCs? I think that we are all part of this new culture of
violence.
These persons, who behaved in the most unparliamentary fashion
possible, are all part of us: our homes, our places of education and
worship. They are all products of our society.
Unless and until there is a paradigm shift in our behaviour, and a
new mindset, we will continue to have this culture of violence.
In the meantime, our children in our homes and our students in our
schools, if they had seen this behaviour on TV, must be wondering as to
how they should behave to solve conflicts. For it is not uncommon for
students to use violence to handle conflict.
It is no good saying that violence is prevalent always and
everywhere. We have to address this matter and that too, soon. So the
responsibility is ours. In our homes and places of education and
worship, we have to teach us to how conflicts must be resolved/handled
and managed.
May we do that soon, so that our society can be saved from this type
of ugly behaviour.
SYDNEY KNIGHT, Rajagiriya.
The Sri Lanka Traffic Laws and regulations have lopsided categories
in classifying vehicles into their respective Classes. This note is to
highlight the inconvenience caused to me as an individual and I am sure
many other citizens will benefit by taking proper action to rectify the
situation.
The category for light vehicles and heavy vehicles have been based
not on the weight of the vehicle rather a flimsy association of the
prefix number of the registration numerals. e.g. The Land Cruiser CJ 78
Vehicle I drive has the 61- 1516 number plate is classified as a heavy
vehicle.
The same brand and make vehicle with 32- xxxx is classified as a
light vehicle just because it carries the prefix of 32 rather than 61.
I came to know this monumental blunder at a traffic police check
point to my utter amazement on July 25 at Negombo.
I am a professional Engineer who runs my own business and travels
around Sri Lanka in the said Jeep, since 2004.
For my travel purposes the Class C, C1 category of licence is
adequate, which entitles me to drive light vehicles.
When I applied for the said licence the application form did not
mention the weight limits associated with the category of the vehicles
under C, C1 but merely mentioned light vehicles or dual purpose
vehicles.
If it did have a clear indication of the weight Category under which
my Jeep, which weighs around 2200 Kg, I would have a clear idea which
category my vehicle belongs and would have obtained a proper Category
licence.
Now according to the Traffic Police officer (who was quick enough to
fill the fine paper for not possessing a proper licence even before I
get down to explain that I just came to know through him that my vehicle
falls under heavy category) I should go and get a heavy vehicle Category
licence.
Now I do not have a problem with that if that is the same for the
people who drive Land Cruiser CJ 78 vehicles with the 32- xxxx sort of
numbers. Otherwise I am going to seek legal action for Fundamental
Rights Violation against the Commissioner of Motor vehicles.
Unless I pay the fine there is going to be a Court case against me
for violation of the traffic law of the land.
Now my question is what is the legal position for the 32- xxxx number
Land Cruiser owners who drive exact same make and weight class vehicles
under C, C1 category of drivers Licence? I can provide many witnesses to
this effect.
During my lengthy discussion with the traffic OIC at Negombo police I
figured there are other blunders like particular make of mini vans
falling under heavy duty vehicle category which probably be lighter than
my Jeep too.
As a professional and a law abiding citizen, I would like Justice
with Equality as professed by the word itself.
Otherwise I am not going to shake my fundamentals off and be a
walking Zombie by abiding stupendous, moronic regulation which violates
the fundamental right of equal treatment under the law of the land.
I humbly request the Commissioner to explain the skewed logic behind
this particular legal imparity and take immediate action to rectify this
by classifying vehicles according to their weight class like it has been
always in this country and any other countries around the world.
I do not need a heavy duty driver's licence and I do not intend to
obtain one as I am not going to drive a heavy vehicle or not seeking
employment as a heavy vehicle driver.
AJITH BORALUGODA, via email.
It is a well-known fact that the late President Premadasa gifted
lorry load of arms and ammunition to the LTTE during his regime. Now,
the leader of the Opposition Wickramasinghe presents sirens to the
border villagers for their protection. Really a joke.
My personal view is that the UNP should withdraw the weapons and
ammunition distributed by the late President and issue to the border
villagers leaving Prabhakaran to present sirens among the LTTE cadres.
It's the best solution to the ethnic conflict.
MAHINDA NIHAL PERERA, Moratuwa.
There is no doubt that there is a power crisis in the country. What
this means briefly, is that demand has outstripped the supply of
affordable power. May I outline below a democratic approach of possible
solutions to the problem.
We will create a people's force that will resist the use of power,
look for alternatives and downgrade power as a whole. We will tax the
use, importation and manufacture of machinery and appliances that use
power, and increase the tax on those who use power and use the funds
generated from these taxes to subsidise the cost of power, so that we
may provide cheaper power.
This is a good opportunity to be proactive in the provision of power
to an impoverished market thereby maximizing the creation of profits. To
enable this we will create a huge fund from available borrowings and
invite the world's power brokers here.
Thereby with the abundant availability of power we can achieve a
growth rate in excess of 10%.
Power is a corruptible force and a creation of the reactionary west
with a view to colonizing down trodden nations such as ours. We will ban
the use of power and revert to indigenous methods of power thereby
freeing our people from the clutches of western nations.
Power is essential for our daily lives, we have therefore organised a
series of ceremonies to invoke blessings on provision of power which
will include, almsgivings, prayer meetings, fasting, lighting of candles
and other activities that will free the demons and other creatures that
have a stranglehold on power that should rightfully belong to us.
In our society we do have our choices so please use them.
M. B., Moratuwa.
Rising cost of living is an uneasy burden. So the consumers always
bring it to the notice of any elected government which is expected to
take necessary steps to relieve them of that burden.
However, the truth is that the COL can never be reduced. For example,
a cup of tea which was 5 cts. in 1960, is Rs. 5 today, and a bun which
was 10 cts. in 1960, is Rs. 10 today; and a gallon of petrol which was
Rs. 2.50 then, is Rs. 418 today, and so on and on.
Successive governments in whichever hue have failed to stall this
phenomenal rise because it is beyond their control. What they did was to
increase the salaries. For instance, a mason who was paid Rs. 5 per day
in 1960 is now paid Rs. 800 a day.
Therefore the most sensible thing is for us to realise that we too
have a responsibility to ease the burden of cost of living that is
pressing on us. We have to stop blaming the government for everything.
Since it is we who are the most affected, we must plan our expenses
according to the income we get without blaming the government or any
other for our own ills and pains. We must take positive measures to
overcome the effect of the rising cost of living.
So the first lesson we have got to follow is to refrain from smoking,
drinking, gambling and taking drugs. That will certainly stabilise and
strengthen the income of about 80% of the families.
Then there will be health, peace and cordiality at home, the key to a
happy household. We must tap our own conscience and ask the question
whether we are fair by ourselves and our families.
Even a lowest paid harbour worker who gets Rs. 30,000 to 40,000 will
find the income not enough if he is engaged in one or more of those
vices mentioned above.
E. M. G. EDIRISINGHE, Dehiwela. |