LTTE's exorcism by 'sleight of apology'
APOLOGY: If there is one spectre that has been haunting the
LTTE leadership, and its leader Prabhakaran, it's the ghost of Rajiv
Gandhi. Now we have it all laid out, by its so-called ideologue, Anton
Balasingham.
It's like a ritual of exorcism, which comes by way of a statement of
regret about the assassination of the former Indian Prime Minister, who
sent the IPKF here to maintain peace. A mission that led to Indian
troops having to fight the LTTE.
Rambling through an abbreviated history of the ethnic crisis in Sri
Lanka, which suits the purpose of the LTTE, this is how Balasingham
proffers his much publicized "apology" to India through NDTV about that
fell deed over two decades ago.
"It was followed by the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi...as far as
that event is concerned, I would say it is a great tragedy, monumental
historical tragedy, for which we deeply regret and we call upon the
Govt. of India and people of India to be magnanimous to put the past
behind...and to approach the ethnic question in a different
perspective".
After 15 long years Balasingham has gone public with more adornment
to the LTTE's regret at the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, than
Prabhakaran expressed, at his first ever media conference in April 2002,
when the LTTE leader said it was a "sad event".
With its increasing isolation in the civilized world, the LTTE is
trying hard to make India and the people of India forget its crime, for
which Prabhakaran has still to face justice under the Indian Penal
System.
Therefore, we have this call by Balasingham to the Indian Government
and the people of India "to be magnanimous to put the past behind and to
approach the ethnic question [in Sri Lanka] in a different perspective."
But Noopur of NDTV is not satisfied with this decorated statement of
regret. He asks Balasingham: "Can the LTTE give any sort of assurance to
India that that kind of a thing won't happen again?"
Just the question that needs to be asked from a leading member of a
terrorist outfit, so glib in expressing regrets for a crime that cannot
be forgotten, by a statement of regret, embellished with words intended
to fool the listener.
And, Balasingham has an assurance to give. Says he: "We have made
pledges to the Govt. of India that under no circumstances we will act
against the interest of the Govt. of India and that ever since the
assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, India played a detached role. What we
feel is India should actively involve in the peace process".
Ask UNICEF
But what is the worth of these pledges the LTTE makes today, in its
desperation to wriggle out of increasing isolation, and hopefully bring
India to be actively involved in the Sri Lankan peace process, the way
it would like to.
As much as we know that a tiger does not change its stripes, the
world knows well that this Tiger is not one that keeps to its pledges.
The record of its observance of the Ceasefire Agreement, largely in the
breach, is a matter of bloody contemporary experience.
But the better test is to judge its record on keeping to its pledges
not to recruit child soldiers. UNICEF knows well how much the LTTE has
strayed from pledges given on this issue.
The worst condemnation of the LTTE on the matter of child soldiers
came from Olara Otunnu, the UN Secretary General's rapporteur on
Children in War. Otunnu said very clearly the LTTE had repeatedly
reneged on pledges to stop the recruitment of children.
It must believe the Indian establishment to be naive beyond belief to
accept pledges given by such an organization about not acting against
the interests of the Government of India.
The interests of New Delhi are many and varied, and one wonders what
aspects of these interests the LTTE would not act against in the future.
The other crimes
It has taken the LTTE more than 15 years to admit to the
assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. It comes far too late, as the Indian
Supreme Court had already found the LTTE and its leader Prabhakaran,
guilty of complicity in this crime.
Prabhakaran is a wanted man in India, and India has not yet pressed
Sri Lanka for his arrest knowing the ground situation here.
But, Balasingham hints at the possible de-proscribing of the LTTE by
India, with the very likely hope that India would be ready to "forgive
and forget" with great magnanimity, the assassination of a former Indian
Prime Minister, in a suicide bomb attack, while still using suicide
killers among its main weapons in Sri Lanka.
After this expression of regret to India, how long will it take for
the LTTE to admit the assassination of President R. Premadasa in 2003,
and the attempted assassination of President Chandrika Kumaratunga in
December 1999?
There are so many other assassinations and as well as mass killings
the LTTE is yet to apologize to the people of Sri Lanka, and also to the
Tamil people for the number of Tamil political leaders, intellectuals,
teachers, trade unionists and writers it has killed.
When will Anton Balasingham think it is time to express regret over
the killing of Buddhist worshippers at the Sri Maha Bodhi, the Buddhist
monks at Arantalawa and the Muslims at prayers in their sacred mosques?
It is most unlikely that such regrets will come, as there is no
strategic interest served, unlike the escape from isolation vis-…-vis
India.
My last question is what the British Government, still sadly led by
Tony Blair, the lapdog of George W Bush in the War on Terror, will now
do about Anton Balasingham? He is a British citizen, residing quite
comfortably in London, and has admitted to his organization banned in
the UK and EU assassinating a former leader of the largest member of the
Commonwealth.
Is the terrorism of Balasingham not worth one hundredth the effort
and cost involved in searching the home of Muslims in London, suspected
of involvement in a terrorist plot, which turned out to be a costly
hoax?
Here is an admitted ideologue of political assassination, who can
breathe summer air so freely in London, offering regrets to India for a
heinous crime that still haunts the LTTE, and shocks the civilized
world. |