Harvard study blasts US treatment of child refugees
UNITED STATES: Unaccompanied children fleeing to the United States to
escape persecution often meet a harsh, hostile reception, slipping
through the cracks of a system designed for adults that compounds their
trauma, a Harvard University study said.
About 8,000 children sought sanctuary in the United States alone -
arriving with no family or adult guardian - in 2003, the most recent
year studied. Many had no legal counsel and were vulnerable to
exploitation, according to a report on the findings.
The 218-page report said the children faced risks that included
military recruitment, sexual violence, exploitative work and physical
abuse.
The two-year study of U.S. immigration laws and agencies said
courtrooms often treat unaccompanied child migrants like adults, or
simply assume they arrived with family.
"There is a void in the immigration law because the law was based on
a faulty assumption," Jacqueline Bhabha, a lecturer at Harvard Law
School and co-author of the report, told Reuters. "A lot of children are
not attached when they arrive."
"Far from attracting a compassionate response, children frequently
attract the opposite - a punitive, harsh, even vindictive attitude.
Children often... are treated worse than adults, not better."
She said some children arrive with smugglers; others with siblings or
someone from their village. "Our laws do not reflect the reality," she
said.
Most fled Central and South America to escape gangs and religious or
political persecution. About 30 percent were from Honduras, 26 percent
from El Salvador, 20 percent from Guatemala, 10 percent from Mexico, 3
percent from Brazil and 2 percent from Ecuador, the study said. Another
2 percent were from China.
The report was part of an international research project in the
United States, Britain and Australia whose findings will be published
this year with an analysis on all the three nations.
Work began in 2004 with data collected from 14 U.S. government
agencies dealing with unaccompanied and separated child asylum-seekers.
About 70 government and non-government workers were interviewed, along
with dozens of children.
One Salvadoran child, identified as Jose, said he felt as if he were
being treated as a bank robber by U.S. agents when he arrived in Arizona
after crossing the Mexican border.
"They didn't believe me when I said that I was a minor. They said
that I was lying. After I was questioned, I was put into a truck and
taken back to the border. No one asked if I was afraid to return to
Mexico. The trucks just unloaded us (on the Mexico side) and drove off,"
he said in the report.
The report urges U.S. authorities to recognize legitimate claims by
child asylum-seekers and conduct more thorough investigations so that
those whose claims are not legitimate are sent home to avoid an "open
door" immigration policy. Boston, Wednesday, Reuters |