Inferno in London
Review: Professor Anura Lekamge
Sri Lankan veteran journalist Arthur U. Amarasena's resolve to
venture into the area of his wife Sriyani Amarasena's boundaries of film
production and direction has paid him off in his maiden attempt by
directing the cine film, Gini Veluma (Inferno).
The movie was shown in London as a premiere recently to a full-house
audience at the auditorium, University of Westminster, Harrow Campus in
the presence of the Deputy High Commissioner for Sri Lanka, Mrs. Shenuka
Seneviratne as chief guest.
Arthur U. Amarasena's broadened responsibility in this production
included writing up of the story, adopting it as a film script, writing
dialogues and finally running the accountability of directing the film
for the first time.
Skulduggery
The story was based on political thuggery and skulduggery by a Junior
Minister in the government (Tilak Kumara Ratnayake ) on an eminent
medical heart surgeon (Wimal Alhakoon) to take revenge after losing his
son following an open heart surgery and secondary infection.
STILL: Gamini Jayalath, Sriyani Amarasena and Wimal Alahakoon in a
scene from Gini Veluma.
|
The politician was enraged further hearing upon a tip-off given to
the police by the surgeon on three of the minister's stooges who had
been involved in a multi-million-rupee bank robbery which brought them
to book.
Emotionally devastated Junior Minister approaches his Chief Minister
(Ravindra Randeniya) to complain and seek his blessings to put a vicious
plan into action with a view to destroying the surgeon's life and the
family.
His subtle vindictive appeal gets a rebuff instead of a blessing from
the Chief Minister pin pointing another aspect of Sri Lankan political
life that one should not generalise and castigate all politicians with
the same yardstick as a bunch of uncivilised power hungry lot who have
like incorrigible school kids!
Planting drugs
However, the Junior Minister in his own way succeeds in destroying
the surgeon and his family by planting drugs in his car with the aid of
a pretty nurse (Nilanthi Dias) who works with the surgeon at the
hospital with his ministerial muscle power.
Ultimately the blameless surgeon becomes a criminal in the eyes of
the Law and is sent to jail for 15 years. Not having satisfied with
brutality to that extent, the Minister works on a further step in
'doctoring' some x-rated photographs of the surgeon with the nurse to
the surgeon's wife to poison her mind.
During his jail term he finds that finally he has lost everything in
life including his own wife and the family. Disappointed, frustrated and
saddened by all these factors he loses interest in worldly affairs and
becomes a Buddhist monk to seek salvation out of meditating in an
isolated retreat in a distant mountain.
Performances
Ravindra Randeniya, Sriyani Amarasena (surgeon's wife) and Cleetus
Mendis (Senior Consultant), Wimal Alahakoon, Chaturika Peiris, Nilanthi
Dias, Gamini Jayalath (police officer) and Tilak Kumara Ratnayake
(Junior Minister) have all contributed their fair share in their
individual performances to make the film a success, while Tilak Kumara
Ratnayake and Gamini Jayalath (police officer) were most effective to
the extent that they were hated by the audience watching the brutality
meted out to the surgeon who had gone from England only to serve his
country and people with all good intentions, without knuckling under to
any external pressures outside his professional knowledge and judgement.
Bottom line
The bottom line of the story conveys several messages to the external
real world. Firstly, it highlights the level of corruption and
misdemeanour still prevalent in the Sri Lankan politics that has not
faded out with the changing hues of political parties over the decades.
It also highlights the vulnerability and susceptibility of ordinary
law-abiding citizens when caught up with the high and mighty political
power bases.
The cardinal point that drives out of the film is that no Sri Lankan
is 'unpatriotic' just because they had to abandon their motherland who
fed and brought them up intellectually expecting her children to look
after her in return but for the same old corruption, injustice,
political thuggery and interference that have become cancerous over many
decades.
Although the film tries to balance it out by focusing on a senior
minister as a law abiding, civilised and educated ruler, what it
portrays on a broader sense is that although it is only a single rotten
apple which becomes exposed out of a collection, there may well be other
apples in the same bunch which seem to appear clean externally and
promising but are rotten within the core from inside! |