When road monsters flex their muscles
TRANSPORT: For many years it was the monster employers, in the form
of private bus owners, who threatened strikes, carried them out and more
often than not had their way with successive governments.
Anything from an increase in the price of diesel, alleged police
harassment of their crews, an increase in the customs duty on spares for
buses, and the pure and simple greed to fleece the travelling public
were enough causes to take their buses off the streets.
This time it's a different stroke. It not the monster employers but
the even more monstrous employees of those employers who threaten strike
action.
It's a good ploy for the private bus owners association, with its all
too public links with the UNP, to seek the disruption of public life,
through a strike by their employees.
The demands are not much different that of their employers. The first
is to get the police off their backs. Give them freedom to rule the
roads in the monstrous way only they know how to, while the police
remain observers of the situation.
Just to give the impression that their intended strike is not against
the travelling public, they have added an interesting demand that
private bus crews be given permanency of service.
It is an interesting ploy because the employers who rake in the
profits, after the rip offs of the public by their crews, can claim they
are helpless in the matter, because if government does not order
permanency to their employees.
It is bad enough having a non-permanent of casual employee, often not
licensed to drive a bus, or one with a fraudulent licence, or else holds
a licence but has no experience in driving a bus on the road. It defies
all sense of horror to give them permanency in the right to kill and
maim on the road.
A crooked nexus
It needs much wild imagination to believe there is no connection or
understanding between the private bus crews threatening to strike
against their employers, and the employers themselves.
It is a crooked nexus between employers and employees to whom the
interests of the travelling public is of the least concern, giving a new
dimension to the power of private bus operators in this country.
The President of the Private Bus Owners' Association, Gemunu
Wijeratne, a UNP candidate at the last General Election, has often
stated on TV and to the Press that a large number of bus drivers and
conductors are drug addicts; that many drivers did not have proper
licences to drive heavy vehicles carrying passengers.
He could never explain why such people were employed, knowing very
well that they were unsuited for the work they were entrusted with. It
is obvious the bus owners association cannot or will not give in to the
fake demand by their crews about permanency of employment.
The bigger issue is the common demand of bus owners and their crews
of the police allegedly harassing them by imposing fines for the
slightest violation of traffic laws. This is indeed a fallacy.
The police department is yet to be rid of some higher ranks who are
themselves private bus operators, not directly but by proxy through
their spouses or close kith and kin.
Whatever the private bus owners and their crews may say, there are
many private bus owners whose crews are never fined by the police, or if
charged provide them an easy escape.
The IGP may say it is only a small number of bad eggs in the police
who are in the private bus racket. But, there is never any quantifying
what this small number is, in a service employing over 100,000.
Corrupt policemen, who turn a blind eye to the violations of traffic
rules by some, are as bad or even worse than those bus crews that
violate the highway code, and those who continue to employ them, even as
casual workers.
Take on these monsters
The government should not give in to these monsters whether private
bus owners or their crews. While the bus crews, echoing their masters,
allege the police are far too often on their backs, the fact is that the
police do not charge them often enough; and that too for really serious
offences.
Despite frequent announcements by the police about crackdowns on
traffic offenders, some bus crews often go scot-free with a whole range
of violations of traffic rules.
Private bus owners holding the travelling public to ransom, either by
themselves, or as it now appears by proxy through their crews cannot be
tolerated any longer.
Far too many have died on the roads, and too many people maimed for
life because of these bus crews, and the employers who brazenly obtain
their services, and do nothing about how they treat passengers.
We will need a special flying squad to catch the conductors who do
not give the full or some of the balance in change when a passenger buys
a ticket in private buses.
The collection from this non-formal extortion is at times be higher
than their daily wage from the employer, who knows all about it, but
doesn't care a damn, as long as he gets his targeted earnings for the
day.
Private bus owners and their crews deserve no sympathy whatever in
their efforts to enrich themselves.
What these bus crews seek by way of permanency is to give EPF and ETF,
gratuity and all other benefits of permanent employees to criminals
plying vehicles on the road and not to genuine employees, skilled in
their work, and follow the courtesies demanded of their job.
It is known that bus owners have already filed their claim for
increase in bus fares, which are due to be revised in July each year,
based on the justification for an increase.
What they are now attempting through their casual or convenient crews
of road terror is to give the public and government a foretaste of what
they are in for if the new fare hike they seek is not given.
The bus owners, who shed copious tears in public about difficulties
in carrying on their business, are always purchasing new vehicles to
keep their fleets on the streets to rake in the profits.
What is always hidden is that the fare hikes demanded are in fact to
keep paying the leasing instalments on their vehicles.
Whatever muscle the private bus owners or their crews may flex, the
fact is that they cannot be off the roads for more than three days,
without defaulting on their lease instalments. That's why they've never
had a bus strike for more than three days.
Let them flex their muscles with all the monstrous threats about the
adverse impact on passenger transport.
The government can be sure that the people will certainly put up with
any hardship, even for a week, if standing firm brings these marauders
of the road to their feet.
It is time their bluff was called, and the police became more
vigilant about bus crews that flout traffic rules, whoever may own their
buses. |