UN moves to create stronger human rights body
UNITED NATIONS: The United Nations moved to create a human rights
body that would be more credible than its current commission, but less
ambitious than that sought by UN chief Kofi Annan, diplomats said.
Swedish diplomat Jan Eliasson, the current president of the UN
General Assembly, presented to the 191 member states a draft proposal
for a 47-state Human Rights Council elected by secret ballot by an
absolute majority. It would meet three times a year for a minimum of 10
weeks.
The new council would be based in Geneva and replace the UN
Commission on Human Rights, heavily criticized for taking years to
pursue abuse cases and allowing nations with less-than-stellar human
rights records to sit in judgment.
Under the draft proposal, membership criteria would tighten and the
council could suspend members whose human rights record were deemed
unacceptable.
Annan called for the text's adoption "within the next few days."
"Obviously the proposal isn't everything I asked for in my report,"
the secretary general told reporters.
"But I think it is a credible basis to move ahead. There are enough
new elements in it for us to be able to build on I don't think anyone
can claim this is old wine in a new bottle."
But the United States expressed reservations.
"We don't think it meets the standards set by the secretary general,"
US ambassador John Bolton told reporters. He refused to say whether the
US would back the plan, signaling that Washington might seek to reopen
negotiations.
Annan, in what appeared to be an oblique reply to Bolton's comments,
declared: "The member states have had enough time to discuss. The issues
are known and now is the time for a decision."
The creation of a Human Rights Council, a key element in a sweeping
reform under way at the world body, was approved in principle by world
leaders at a summit at UN headquarters in New York last September.
But definition of its scope and operations has been the subject of
fierce debate.
Eliasson, who oversaw the negotiations, said the text marks a
compromise on all controversial points, such as the size of the future
council, criteria for admission, and the frequency of its meetings.
The plan calls for nation candidates for a council seat to be elected
by the General Assembly by an absolute majority, currently 97 votes.
Annan and Western countries had wanted election by a two-thirds
majority. But a number of Third World countries, members of the
Non-Aligned Movement and the Group of 77, pushed for a majority of the
ballots cast on the day of a vote.
The proposal also claims a right for universal review, which would
mean that all countries, including the most powerful such as the US and
China, could be called to defend their human rights record.
New York, Friday, AFP |