Lankan cricket on the mend?
THE Sri Lanka cricket team which had a lean run in the shorter
version of the game was able to finally get their act together and give
the no. 1 one-day side in the world the Australians a good run for their
money by taking them the full distance of three finals in the recently
concluded VB triangular series.
The past three months have perhaps been the hardest for the national
cricket team. Not only did they get a hammering in India where they lost
the one-day series 1-6 and the Test 0-2, but they also failed miserably
in New Zealand where they lost three out of four one-day internationals.
Going across the Tasman seas to Australia they came up against the
best two ranked one-day sides Australia and South Africa.
Their progress in the series was not convincing, just two wins (one
each against South Africa and Australia) in the first seven qualifying
games.
The crunch match was the final qualifying game which either team had
to win to meet Australia in the best of three finals. It was here that
fortunes started to swing Sri Lanka's way.
They not only beat the Proteas convincingly by 76 runs at Hobart, but
took one step further where no past Sri Lankan team had been able to
achieve by beating Australia in one of the finals.
Not even the team that qualified for the finals in 1995-96 (and then
went onto win the World Cup two months later) were able to defeat the
Aussies in the best of three finals.
That sensational 22-run win at Adelaide really rocked the Aussies and
they came back with a vengeance in the remaining two matches to win them
and take the series 2-1. Australia showed by their displays in these two
matches why they are regarded as the best outfit in the business for so
long. But Sri Lanka was not disgraced by any means.
The fact that they stretched the world champs to the limit and made
them fight for every run and wicket is quite commendable. That is how it
should be. As long as they give the opposition a good fight and lose no
one would grudge the loss. But folding up tamely without a whimper is
not acceptable.
One hopes that the national team can draw the confidence and the
strength from the Australian experience and forge ahead and restore the
position of No. 2 in the one-day rankings which they held not so long
ago.
All credit to them for taking every criticism that had been leveled
against them in their stride and continuing to perform the only way they
can. That is on the field. Any team that does not perform well to
potential will invite criticism from all quarters. The Sri Lankan side
is no exception.
Arnold's plight
When the national team of any sport does not perform to expectations
fingers start pointing immediately at the captain and the team
management and then to the national selectors.
Sometimes it happens the other way around with the selectors having
to take the brunt of criticism. Being a selector is a thankless job.
When the going is good they are the best and when everything is not
going true to form they are the villains.
The latest criticism that is leveled against them is the non
selection of middle order batsman Russel Arnold for the Bangladesh tour.
The reason given for it in a media release by the chairman of
selectors is that he is being "given a break along with several other
senior cricketers in order to give them (the selectors) an opportunity
to try out a few more young players who have performed well in the
domestic tournament so that they gain valuable exposure to international
cricket". All well and good. How the pro-Arnold fans will take this for
answer is another matter.
To the general public Arnold who had been struggling to find a
permanent place in the national side has suddenly started to show the
form which made him an indispensable item in the team not so long ago.
He has proved his credentials with two fine half-centuries in the VB
series finals against Australia and by topping the Sri Lankan batting in
the series with an average of 53.68 for 322 runs with a strike rate of
81.
Then to suddenly leave him out on the face of two good knocks is
something many will find hard to digest. What we are made to understand
is that the squad for Bangladesh was picked well before the last two
finals and the selectors had already made up their minds that a younger
player should go to Bangladesh.
Under 19 World Cup
The ICC under 19 World Cup will draw to a close on Sunday with the
Super League final. Over the past two weeks we have been witness to some
absorbing cricket and upsets, which are part and parcel of this
fascinating game.
The only thing of regret is that the matches were not spread far and
wide throughout the country which would have not only promoted the game
outside the cricket starved metropolis but brought in more curious
spectators to the venues.
The ICC must be quite happy that everything has gone to schedule
without any major hiccups. From the media point of view the arrangements
has been spot on with no complaints.
The ICC and SLC's media co-ordinator for the tournament Samantha
Algama said that he had not received complaints of any nature from the
35 foreign media personnel covering the tournament nor from the local
media which amounts to around 150 journalists from the print and
electronic.
"I am greatly disturbed by certain news reports appearing in sections
of the media painting a negative picture of the media facilities.
We have appointed trained personnel as media managers at each and
every venue and have not received any complaints from them so far. We
have maintained the standards set by the ICC and I am quite happy to say
that everything has worked out well," said Alagama. |