Of Waists, Hips, Coffee and Grunts!
Global Miscellany by M. V. Muhsin
Before you decide to read this column any further, do go and get a
measuring tape! Then get to work to answer the question: what's your
Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR). Let's begin:
1. First measure your waist at the smallest part
Waist = ....... inches
2. Next measure your hips at their widest points
Hips = ....... inches
3. Don't cheat!
4. Now divide your waist measurement by your hip measurement
WHR = .......
Now take a deep breath and reflect on the result. A study in recent
edition of the medical journal The Lancet argues that the results of
this exercise can help to better assess a measure of fat distribution
and thereby the risk for disease linked to being overweight (obese).
If you are a woman, you are said to be at lower risk if your WHR is
less than 0.8, and therefore at higher risk if it's greater than 0.8.
For men, the risk is lower if the WHR is less than 1.0 and, by
implication higher if it's greater than 1.0.
If the math confuses you, and you are beginning to perspire, here is
an example: if you are a man with a 42 inch waist and 38 inch hips, your
WHR is 1.10 and you fall in to high risk category.
If you are a woman with 36 inch waist and 39 inch hips your WHR is
0.92, and you too fall into the high risk category. If you are a woman
with a 26 waist and a 34 hip measurement, with a WHR of 0.76, all one
can say is wow!
The Lancet study is, of course, only an indicator and there are
indeed other factors that play into the elements of risk. But the
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases in the
US says "however defined, overweight and obesity contribute to the
development of a number of debilitating diseases, including arthritis,
heart disease and diabetes".
The reason being, according to an analyst J.W. Payne of the
Washington Post, body fat stored around the abdomen is more dangerous
than fat stored around the hips and thighs.
More abdominal fat surrounding internal organs, including the liver,
has been linked to higher risks of heart attacks, diabetes and other
illnesses.For those who refuse to accept the reality of the ratio and
the risk factors, yes there are many arguments for and against the
concept, but for now my advice is eat less rice and consume no sugar,
and exercise!
* * * * * * *
There are many ways to get into the Guinness Book of World records,
but a Maryland resident in the US is trying to achieve this in an
addictive fashion.
John Winter Smith has bought coffee at more than 4,500 outlets of the
Starbucks Coffee chain in North America and 213 overseas. His goal is to
go "global" with Starbucks.
According to a journal Newsday, as of December 2005, the chain owned
4,525 stores in North America and 1,018 abroad. Smith, the journal says,
has driven over 70,000 miles in the past year. What a fine advertisement
for Starbucks. Here's a challenge: who will attempt this for a brand of
good Ceylon Tea?
* * * * * * *
The women's singles at the Australian Tennis Open Championship last
Saturday drew much attention when Justine Hardene, threw in the towel
(or racket) through exhaustion when the final was just a set and two and
a half games old. This brought to mind another dimension of women's
tennis. During the last Wimbledon, a London Tabloid, ran a "gruntometer"
score of 101.2 decibels for Maria Sharpova, measuring the level of
"grunting" that was heard whilst serving. It was said that the noise was
as aloud as a police siren, give or take some exaggeration! Picking up
this concept a San Jose journal came out with the following sound
equivalents:
Maria Sharapova (101) = subway train
Serena Williams (88) = lawn mower
Venus Williams (85) = heavy traffic
Lindsay Davenport (84) = Hand saw
Elena Bovina (81) = hair dryer.
It is said that according to the League for Hard Hearing, continued
exposure to noise above 85 decibels will cause hearing loss over time!
As to why the results were released only for the women players is a good
question, though. May be it's off the charts ..... sound of an on coming
train! |