Arresting the decline
EVER since the Minister of Sport announced last week that he would be
calling for elections to the seven sports bodies which are currently
under interim administration before the end of March, the local sports
circles have been agog with a hive of activity.
None so much as the interim body appointed to administer cricket.
Representatives of all seven interim administrations were summoned by
the Sports Minister's secretary and asked to present the progress they
had made so far and the plans they have for the future.
No indication was given by the Ministry officials to the respective
representatives whether they will be asked to continue or disbanded.
Regardless of what the final decision of the Sports Minister will be
with regard to the future of cricket's interim body, some meaningful
steps need to be taken to address the decline of our national cricket
team.
Since November last year, the team has been sliding down the gradient
at an alarming pace with no signs of any improvement forthcoming.
Reports filtering in from New Zealand and Australia suggest the sole
cause of the poor performances is the disunity that exists within the
team. Although the team management has gone to great lengths to paint a
rosy picture of how united the team is the truth is far from it.
Player mafia
What we hear about is a player-mafia that is in existence within the
team where certain senior players have ganged up together to safeguard
their respective positions. Their attitude towards those junior to them
has been rather shockingly disrespectful from cricketers of their
stature.
The junior players we are told are not given their due place. This is
nothing new because this sort of player mafia has been in existent with
past Sri Lankan teams also.
What we hear from the grapevine is that players like Michael van Dort
and Chamara Kapugedera are cold shouldered and not given the due
recognition by the seniors because they refuse to bow down to them and
become their baggage boys.
Take the case of Kapugedera, the youngest member of the team. He was
picked for the Test tour of India but was sent home even before the
series started with a knee injury which according to the team physio's
assessment, adequate recovery was unlikely for two weeks.
However within a week after being sent home, Kapugedera was playing
for CCC in the Premier tournament and also scoring runs.
In yesterday's VB series match against Australia at Melbourne thereby
lies a story the manner in which Van Dort was run out by Jayawardene's
call after getting close to a half-century.
There are also unconfirmed reports of certain senior players having
late night outs of which the management has no control over.
In the light of all these allegations, some of the interim committee
members have flown to Australia to ascertain the actual position.
If Sri Lanka intend getting the players back on track and start
performing to their potential as a first step they should seriously
reconsider their salary structures which comes up for review at the end
of March.
Comfort zone
Presently at least six senior players are sitting quite comfortably
perched on salaries of five lakhs of rupees a month which in addition to
prize money and other per diem add upto quite a tidy sum.
The manager in his tour report on the recently concluded tour to
India stated that 'the current batsmen are too much in the comfort zone
due to a lack of ready replacements and I cannot but feel they are too
complacent...'
If Sri Lanka Cricket wants the players to perform at their best they
will need to restructure the salaries giving them a decent flat rate per
month, but paying them fat bonuses for performances and wins.
The salary structure of coach Tom Moody is drawn on a performance
incentive scheme where he gets a big bonus for beating ICC ranked teams
from 1-5 and a smaller bonus for winning against teams rated from 6-10
on a home and away basis.
Moody also stands to gain a lot more if he can guide Sri Lanka to win
the ICC Champions trophy in India in November and the ICC World Cup in
the Caribbean next year.
Because the coach spends the majority of his time with the players,
one cannot see any reason why the same performance incentives cannot be
applied to the players as well. After all it is the combination of these
two that make a successful team.
We know for sure the moment Sri Lanka Cricket makes an attempt to
revise the salary structure the players are going to be up in arms and
try to make a case of it.
But hard decisions have to be taken in the interest of Sri Lanka
cricket. The administration has got to be strong to tell the players
where to get off. Either they perform and deliver or they don't get
paid. It's as simple as that.
The West Indies Cricket Board was firm enough to leave out players in
the calibers of Brian Lara, Ramnaresh Sarwan, Chris Gayle, Corey
Colleymore to name a few for the tour of Sri Lanka where there was a
dispute over team and individual sponsorships.
True the West Indies side was weakened with several 'A'. side players
making up the squad, but at least the West Indies Board got the message
across to the players that they meant business. The rebel players
subsequently returned for the next series in Australia. |