Authority undecided over gas price issue
As the two companies which control the country's LPG market continue
to put pressure on the Government the Consumer Affairs Authority (CAA)
said yesterday that it has not consented to a gas price increase.
However, the two gas companies said that they will have to seriously
consider whether to continue with their businesses unless a favourable
response was given by the government.
"The government should allow us to increase the price or provide us
some form of concession if we are to continue with our business," Laugfs
Holding's Chairman W.K. Wegapitiya told the Daily News. It was earlier
reported a Shell Gas Lanka Ltd. official too said that the company would
be compelled to discontinue its LPG business if the government would not
allow a price increase.
The Chairman of the CAA Sarath Wijesinghe told the Daily News
yesterday that the authority is has closely studied the representations
made by the two companies but are yet to make a decision on the matter.
"While protecting the consumer we also have to look into the
difficulties of the industry.
However, subsidising the domestic gas industry is a matter which is
in the hands of the government," Wijesinghe said. The two companies said
that a price increase is unavoidable due to surging gas prices in the
international market.
Meanwhile, there are complaints that the two gas companies although
increase gas prices according to fluctuations in the international
market they do not pass on the benefit of the reduced world market
price.
A former official of the Fair Trading Authority (later replaced by
CAA) told the Daily News that the Commission had to direct Shell Gas
Lanka Ltd in 2003 to reduce its selling price of gas by Rs.45.
"There were also attempts by some other companies to enter the local
LPG market. It would have open the market for more competition. When
Laugfs Gas entered the market in 2001 there was optimism that the
competition would lead to reasonable prices for consumers, but it has
not happened," the official said.
He said the Fair Trading Commission had also declared earlier that
Shell Gas Lanka Limited (SGLL) which held a monopoly in the LP Gas
market in Sri Lanka had been using its position in a manner that
restricts the consumers' choice and the competition, thereby operating
against public interest. |