Two days with Ibsen
A seminar cum workshop was held to mark the death centenary of Henrik
Ibsen, the great Norwegian Dramatist where the life and works were
discussed. This columnist who had produced and directed three plays by
Henrik Ibsen in Sinhala happened to be one of the resource persons.
A colourful array of artistes gathered in the auditorium of Hotel
Confifi, Beruwala, Sri Lanka, to initiate the understanding of Henrik
Ibsen (1828-1906) the man and the dramatist whose centenary death
anniversary falls next year.
They consisted of writers, critics, researchers, film, stage and
television actors who were invited by the newly formed organisation
named 'Platform for alternate culture' in collaboration with the
Norwegian Embassy in Sri Lanka.
The convenor of this seminar cum workshop, meant for the building of
a rapport via a face to face communication was Sumithra Rahubaddha, a
novelist, a television playwright and a senior administrator.
This is perhaps a second in a series of such seminars in preparation
for the great event envisaged in 2006.
As the first step in the matters relating to Ibsen, the two
organising committees helped to translate three works of Ibsen (Hedda
Gabler, Master Builder and Pillars of Community) followed by a
production of Master Builder.
It is observed that the world which knows and influenced by Ibsen is
making the best attempt to introduce Ibsen to the new generation which
is a must for the development of theatrical arts in the modern world.
Though passed away one hundred years ago, Ibsen left a resourceful
and stimulating legacy of vibrant creative thoughts and an indelible
mark in the theatre tradition as a creator of some of the most brilliant
innovative works remembered for all times.
Ibsen was loved by some, while he was also detested for his daring
creativity by some others. Bernard Shaw in his eye opening booklet
titled 'Quintessence of Ibsenism' made the theatre world reassess the
role of the creative artist via Ibsen.
Since then the two terms 'Ibsenite and Ibsenism' came to stand not
merely as intimate catch words but as terms denoting exact theatrical
meanings.
The term Ibsenite is very often used for a dramatist who for the most
part a follower and a lover of Ibsen who made use of the script as an
indepth study of the social matrix with a narrative structure watchable
underlying a subtext intermixed, elevating the plane level of viewing.
Ibsen who is hailed as the 'father of the modern theatre' left no
stone unturned in his creative flux where he enveloped almost all the
sensitive aspects of the society inclusive of domestic interactions
between wife and husband.
One good example is A Doll's House, a play discussed widely around
the world as the work that intermixes the hidden pains in the life of a
wife and the attempt to cover it.
Then there is also the example of the individual and his morals, in
'Ghosts', a play where a mother does not want her son to know much about
his father and keeps it a hidden entity.
The subject of the man is one dominant area in Ibsen for example take
a work like, 'Pillars of Community', a play where the hypocrisy of the
individual over pervades his real self demeaning the human standpoint.
Another recurrent theme is the image of the man in search of truth
and his inner self. The best example comes from 'An Enemy of the
People', a play that revolves round the investigations of a medical
doctor, who sees the disaster which will befall on the society, but he
is being prevented from revealing the truth due to extraneous socio
political stigma. These are several random example to cite, and
discussed widely.
In Sri Lanka the introduction of Ibsen came around the first decade
of the sixties (both in Sinhala and English) with plays such as Hedda
Gabler, Lady from the sea, A Doll's House, The Wild Duck and An Enemy of
the People.
It is also said that 'Ibsen shook and shattered staid Victorian
sensibilities by bringing up in public subjects that were utterly taboo
there, by championing a multitude of unpopular attitudes toward the
society of his time, by challenging, indeed, many of the very bases of
complacent middle class morality' (Norris Houghton in Seeds of Modern
Drama vol. 3, 1963).
Some of the views transpired at the two day Ibsen session at Beruwala
was significant, for the organisers made an attempt to cover all the
salient aspects of Ibsenism, initially with an introduction to his life
and works, gradually entering into the realms of thematic significance
attempting to interpret the textual contents and then to the study of
certain plays selecting scenes to be enacted by the amateur actors
helped by the veterans.
This was a practical exercise done by three main groups by way of a
key selection from A Doll's House, proving that Ibsen could be replanted
in the local soil with the serious participation on the part of the
trained actor, performer.
A long discussion followed this session where some of the local
artistes aired their views. One of the main points raised was the
necessity to build a theatre school where the local artiste could be
groomed to take up challenges, such as writing, directing, producing and
performing. Such plans come and go and the necessity remains for ever.
One of the remarkable presentations were made by the well-known actor
Ravindra Randeniya interpreting the 'method acting' as pronounced by the
well-known theorist and drama director Constantin Stanislawski.
In fact the underlying idea was the necessity to grasp 'the method
acting' in order to elevate the contents or the theatrical experiences
of dramatists of the calibre of Ibsen in terms of powerful
visualization. Perhaps the acting limitations as found in our theatre
scene has to be reassessed.
He came out with various examples in his own career as an actor
explaining to the participants the significance of training in various
aspects of creative communication.
Ariyawansa Ranaweera, the translator and poet underlined the
character significance of Ibsen with special reference to the creation
of the 'hero and the anti hero' as against those heroes one encounters
in the Greek, Roman and Medieval English plays.
He showed how Ibsen attempted to create a more modern hero where the
age old heroism is recreated in terms of social changes over the years.
Once again the need for the modern day dramatists to discuss
communication issues pertaining to the theatre scene was stressed.
Some of the participants believed that the absence of a healthy face
to face discussion to build up a theatre conscience is the main barrier
for the development of theatrical activities in our country.
|