Floods, garbage and local authorities
by Tharuka Dissanaike
Last week's flash flood brought with it an unforeseen problem. For
days, sometimes even a week after the flood, piles of garbage were left
rotting by the roadsides, adding to the already unpleasant situation in
urban areas which suffered most from the heavy downpour.
The situation was extremely bad in certain residential quarters in
the city and suburbs. People, now used to throwing their collected
garbage on the road, then forgetting about it, were faced with the issue
of uncollected thrash at their doorstep.
Meanwhile local authorities looked hapless. Their problem was the
rain and flood. Because of the inundation of wetlands and low-lying
areas, local authorities- urban councils, Pradeshiya Sabhas and such
lost their conventional 'dumping grounds'. In other areas large
municipality trucks could not reach the dump sites due to excessive road
damage and flooded roads. So the flood crisis was followed by a garbage
crisis.
It is difficult to avoid seeing the inter-relations. local
authorities are primarily responsible to maintain drainage and ensure a
healthy environment in their jurisdiction. This means that they need to
make sure that drainage is maintained, that hap hazard development is
avoided and that garbage is collected and disposed of in a manner that
is not injurious to the environment or the people.
But local authorities by and large are guilty of not doing any of
these functions well. In fact, by performing one-i.e garbage disposal-
they compromise on the other function- hampering drainage by clogging
the marshes. It could well be said that both problems faced by the
people during the last week- flood and garbage- are a direct result of
local authority inaction and a lack of long-term planning, or for that
any kind of sustainable planning.
Even as the flood waters subsided, I noticed a fleet of earth trucks
moving down the Airport Road, carrying freshly mined gravel to a fill
site on some marsh in the interior of Wattala. If lessons on drainage
had to be learnt the hard way, one would have expected that the October
floods to have taught us.
But not so. Land filling continues with impunity and local
authorities have no plan- long or short term- to control and regulate
this practice that has gone on for a long, long time.
By encroaching upon what was once an extensive marsh, we are
naturally compromising the environment's ability to deal with storm
water, the natural way. By allowing and permitting such land filling-
extensive tracts of many acres in some places- local authorities are
being negligent about maintaining proper drainage.
Above all this, local authorities themselves contribute to land
filling and additional pollution by dumping solid waste in the marshes.
They will tell you quite plaintively that there is no other place for
them to dump and that they have no option. But this excuse cannot be
tolerated by the rate-paying public.
A flood that comes every 100 years or every 50 years, cannot be
avoided. If one is unlucky enough to get caught in such weather, no
amount of planning can save people and property. But do we have to
suffer flood every time a heavy downpour happens? Do we have to wade
through flooded roads when it rains hard for 20 minutes? Do we need to
suffer dirty drainage water in our gardens and homes, because the local
authority has permitted some 'big shot' industrialist to convert the
marsh in to factory?
|