Book Review : Water in the open economy
Water: Perspectives, Issues, Concerns
by Ramaswamy R. Iyer
SAGE Publications, New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, London.
Review by U. Karunatilake
The scope of Prof. Ramaswamy R. Iyer's book is wide, comprehensive
and up-to-date, coming from a reputed authority at the Centre for Policy
Research, New Delhi.
It covers the constitutional and legal role of India's federal
structure, policy making and planning and usage of water the most vital
resource for life the issues and problems of large dams, the cross
border security related to flow of water through more than one country,
their separate requirements of water inter-country water conflicts and
resolution by treaty planning for the future development and utilisation
of water resources.
These issues are directly and lucidly covered without long-winded
approaches and conjectures. The hypocrisy of the economic growth plea in
the profit oriented global exploitation of vital resources, is exposed.
The constitutional aspects of water resources in a federal structure
bearing on inter-state water disputes, the limitations of statutory
provisions, the solutions adopted and their inadequacy are discussed in
relation to the Cauvery River basin.
This problem began as a dispute between the upstream State of
Karnataka and the downstream state of Tamil Nadu, but has brought in two
other States, Kerala upstream and Pondicherry downstream, with smaller
demands on the Cauvery waters.
The other shows how the legal, technical and administrative steps
taken by the central and state governments in solving the problem have
been complicated by electoral politics which exploit historical,
religious, cultural and emotional responses which are illogical and
intractable. This should be a warning to us in Lanka where emotional
responses to sharing of resources and opportunities also tend to get
politicised even without a federal constitution.
Prof. Iyer cautions that water sharing has to be subordinate to
national water policy which every country that claims to be democratic
has to state in terms of equity and social justice. In outlining
national water policy water is treated as a scarce and precious natural
resource related to catchment, basin and groundwater sources with
special regard to the human and environmental aspects, giving first
priority to drinking water and next to land use.
Water policy covers flood prone and drought affected areas, project
planning for multiple benefits, rainfall data and projections on river
flow.
We in Lanka have to take notice of lack of consistent policy and
neglect of data in the large dam projects where colossal public
expenditure has gone into the Mahaweli system with massive multipurpose
dams and reservoirs but no water as project for irrigation or power and
no flood protection when most required.
The author has indicated the danger of electoral politics in negating
legislative and administrative processes, but we have seen in Lanka how
river authority legislation, and technocratic planning and
decision-making first upheld a thirty year river basin development
schedule which got stampeded into an "accelerated" five-year project,
with negative returns on power and irrigation.
A similar situation on a smaller scale has prevailed in the
Lunugamvehera project and the Upper Kotmale Project where technocrats
belonging to respected professional institutions have been seen to go
back on their original recommendations and decisions.
Prof. Ramaswamy Iyar will no doubt be amused that the recanting of
technical and scientific decisions takes place with the connivance of
foreign lending institutions and foreign contractors. He has himself
observed that "what we call development is greed and with the triumph of
the market forces ideology, the march of globalisation, and the tide of
consumerism all over the world, greed seems to have come to stay".
We hope not, because all human culture rejects greed, conflict, and
self-illusion as the root of evil though they are the corner stones of
capitalist ideology. We see that two millennia if capitalism have failed
and the planned use of resources for social and economic equity must
take over.
Summing up Prof. Iyer continues, "At the moment it is difficult to
see how a change of direction is going to be brought about and doom
averted.
The advocacy of such a course is likely to be dismissed as naive and
romantic............... we shall have to be content with the concept of
sustained development which implies postponement rather than elimination
of doom............... if in fact Water is a scarce resource that is
becoming scarcer because of increasing population and if a crisis is
looming on the horizon should not that consciousness of scarcity and
impending crisis guide our planning?"
From this perspective and with his personal resources of technical
know-how, worldwide project experience and consultancy to various
international bodies including the World Bank and the World Commission
on Dams, Prof. Iyer provides the guidelines for the future, writing very
readably on a large spectrum of Indian experience like national water
policy, river basin planning, groundwater legislation, large dam
projects, the World Commission on Dams and the Indian reality, water and
security in South Asia and shortcomings in thinking on water resource
development, and augmentation and linking of rivers, pointing out flaws
in concept and implementation. |