Point of View:
Why not a word about foreign policy?
BY DR. H. S. S. Nissanka
IT IS strange that neither of the two leading candidates, in the
forthcoming presidential election has uttered a word about the foreign
policy that he would follow after he became the President of Sri Lanka.
In the UNP manifesto (containing 17 points) issued at Sirikotha by
presidential candidate Ranil Wickremesinghe, there was no reference to
foreign policy at all. This is a great lacuna.
The other candidate, Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapakse too has not
made any statement about the foreign policy that he would follow as the
President. We have yet to see his presidential election manifesto.
In Sri Lanka, the President is the ultimate authority having powers
to decide the country's home and foreign affairs.
The silence of the two candidates about their foreign policy does not
mean that they have ignored this vital aspect of governance and even so
it is not too late to issue public announcements on the issue of foreign
policy.
Academic researches have revealed that a country should have a
well-conceived and well-constructed foreign policy without which the
success of its home policy is almost an impossibility. Students of
history some times have to compare and contrast the home policy with the
foreign policy of a given ruler.
One such a question that this writer had to answer was whether S. W.
R. D. Bandaranaike's foreign policy was more successful or greater value
than his home policy.
One conspicuous lacuna in the 2005 presidential campaigns as revealed
in the print and electronic media, is that there is no academic or
intellectual depth in the policy statements so far declared by either of
the leading candidates.
Presidential campaigns are aimed at canvassing votes. They have
spoken of issues that appeal to the stomach rather than to the head of
the voters.
Compared with other countries particularly those in the Asian region,
in Sri Lanka we have a public which is educated, experienced and
intelligent which can see through election promises.
This general intelligentsia will understand that the country needs a
foreign policy without which much of election promises cannot be
realised.
Governing a country without a foreign policy is like trying to push a
loaded cart which has only one wheel.
Therefore it is not too late even now for the leading candidates to
include their foreign policy statements in their manifesto.
This writer has written two volumes and a large number of published
articles on the premises that the Sri Lanka Government under different
political leaders like D. S. Senanayake, S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike, J. R.
Jayewardene and Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, all had well-defined
foreign policies.
What is meant by the term foreign policy? There is a general belief
that statements on the world issues expressed by the ruler of a given
country are his foreign policies. But such statements are nothing more
than his ad-hoc responses to world issues.
This writer after nearly 40 years of research and writings, is now
convinced that Sri Lanka from her independence to this date has had no
foreign policy. No doubt, this is a shocking exposure.
Everybody in the foreign services will be up in arms against this
writer and so will be the political leaders of both sides. The foreign
ministry has no foundation or master plan, therefore there is no
coherence in its actions.
There was and still there is in the Foreign Ministry, too much of
spirit which gives its place to self interest and the second or third
place to the country's interest. Of course, there are a few
distinguished foreign ministry officials to whom this statement does not
apply.
The Sri Lankan foreign service needs radical changes so that the
image of Sri Lanka produced abroad will be one of which we can be proud
of. We need a foreign service with vision and a sense of mission.
The Sri Lankan foreign service has deteriorated and is deteriorating
mainly due to a lack of consistent long term foreign policy. What do we
mean by "Foreign Policy"? It is a plan of action with specific
objectives and targets to be achieved or reached within a specific time
frame.
In other words a foreign policy should be a legal document drafted by
experienced foreign service men and approved by the President in
consultation with the Minister of Foreign Affairs.
Everybody in the Foreign Ministry and officers manning the diplomatic
missions abroad should have a clear understanding of the foreign policy
which has been approved by the President of this country.
The foreign policy document should provide guidelines on policy
implementation and policy assessment.
Some countries follow the stereotype assessment systems such as
periodical reports. Sri Lanka should evolve new techniques of evaluation
of achievements or failures in the implementation of her foreign policy.
Some people have mixed up principles and policy. For instance
non-alignment or friendship with all nations are not policies but
principles or guidelines whereas policy is a well-developed course of
action directed towards serving national interests of Sri Lanka.
The present practice of taking up issues of foreign affairs on an ad
hoc manner should come to an end.
Decisions must be in keeping with the policy which we call the legal
document approved by the President.
This policy document must be an achievement oriented one which serves
the best of national interests.
Finally, it should be pointed out that our Foreign Ministry must be
restructured to establish efficiency and get the best out of everybody
in the Foreign Service of Sri Lanka.
It is hoped that who ever becomes the president of this country at
the forthcoming presidential election, will have to follow a dynamic
"Foreign Policy", well-designed and well-constructed plan, with worthy
objectives, targets and a set of alternative strategies.
In the implementation of foreign policy, Sri Lanka has to utilise lot
of diplomatic skills set to achieve the targets. The development of a
new foreign policy and restructuring and revitalising the Foreign
Ministry of Sri Lanka is a must! |