Omnibus, the conveyance of all
BY CHANDRA Edirisuriya
AN omnibus is a conveyance by which all can travel without any
distinction. However, mostly, those who do not own vehicles travel by
bus in our country. The omnibus is indeed a boon to anyone rich or poor
to travel short distances or very long distances not covered by the
railway.
In advanced countries as well as in regulated economies with a sense
of priority most people do not travel all the time by their own vehicles
for reasons of economy, owing to their unostentatious lifestyles and
also to avoid traffic congestion.
In recent pictures of bomb blasts in London one could see how
prominent the London transport double decker buses were, well maintained
and shining in beautiful bright red colour.
The bus companies in our country were replaced by the Ceylon
Transport Board (CTB) in 1958 blue printed on London Transport. The CTB
functioned well under the chairmanship of Vere De Mel of Ceylon Civil
Service fame.
Motor bus transport started in this country no sooner buses were put
on the roads in Britain since we were a British colony. At first there
were individual owned buses and buses of different owners sometimes
plied on the same route.
Motorable roads were not many in those days. Often there were clashes
among the operators for the load, leading even to stabbings. Taking note
of the parlous state of affairs that prevailed the British government
appointed the Nelson Commission to go into the ills of omnibus
transport.
The Commission recommended the issuing of route licences, the
formation of limited liability bus companies to replace individual
owners and doing away with the open body buses to make room for closed
body buses that came to be known as Nelson body buses.
The CTB that took the place of the bus companies was revived by the
late Anil Moonesinghe as Minister and Chairman.
He proved that a crumbling transport empire covering the length and
breadth of the country could be resuscitated and rejuvenated by dint of
sheer determination and meticulous conduct.
He was a one man flying squad and his metallic blue Volkswagon
Variant station wagon could be seen parked in nooks and corners even in
the wee hours to nab errant bus crews. He made profits out of a concern
written off as losing giant.
His modus operandi was to run standee buses even to Anuradhapura
during the festive season with two conductors and deploy ticket checkers
in the Fiat cars which he got as a personal gift from the Fiat company
to nab errant conductors and ticketless travellers.
He also imported a fleet of British built Leyland luxury buses for
private hire. Austria where he was our Ambassador recently gave us a
gift of 20 buses probably in recognition of his ardour for public
transport.
The CTB fleet those days included buses locally built on Mercedes
Benz, Leyland Tiger Cub, Fiat, Hino, AEC and OM chases and imported
built buses of Mercedes Benz make with Voll bodies and plywood bucket
seats or foam rubber cushioned seats, and of Fiat, Albion and Leyland
Wayne makes imported from Germany, Italy and UK respectively.
There were even Magirus Deutsche German built buses and a
Czechoslovakian make Skoda bus with a trailer, running on Galle road.
Later Isuzu chassis were imported from Japan and Tata and Ashok Leyland
built buses were imported from India.
In the bus company days initially there were only petrol buses of
Chervolet, Ford, Austin, Dodge, Bedford makes built on chasses imported
from America and England.
The Sri Lanka Omnibus Company had a large fleet of these buses. It
was only later that Leyland Comet diesel chassis were imported by the
South Western Bus Company of Sir Cyril de Zoysa. This Company was also
the first to get down used double decker buses from London Transport.
The CTB was at a very low ebb by the year 1977 and again individual
owners were allowed to operate private buses to meet the passenger
transport needs.
Although private buses coming into the scene again has detracted from
the orderliness that prevailed in the hey day of the CTB there is one
consolation in that there is no wastage as in the case of the state bus
services now.
Even the old buses auctioned, sometimes for a nominal price, are very
frugally and economically used by private operators. And also private
buses, especially long distance buses, are more comfortable to travel in
and cleaner than the State run buses.
The fact that maximum use is made of buses by private operators saves
valuable foreign exchange otherwise wasted by the State run bus services
in not maintaining buses properly.
Pictures of buses discarded in their hundreds in State bus depots can
be seen frequently in newspapers and no corrective action seems to be
taken. Pilfering of spare parts and tyres from buses was once rampant.
In addition bus conductors sometimes don't issue tickets for the fare
charged from passengers. Flying squads to check ticketless travellers
are seen once in a blue moon.
The State run bus services have become a white elephant. There has
always been an excess of staff owing to successive governments
recruiting employees indiscriminately.
Today it seems that in some bus depots there is no money to pay the
salaries of drivers, conductors and mechanics who are so vital for the
operation of bus services.
I believe there is an excess only of other staff with very high
salaries who are not essential for operating buses.
In the bus company days there was the owner, and a driver, a
conductor and a cleaner for each bus plus a few mechanics and ticket
checkers. There were no big buildings to house offices full of staff not
really needed for the main operation.
The SLCTB also runs pilgrims rests and a driving school. If these are
also running at a loss the citizen has the right to file action against
the SLCTB for engaging in pursuits outside its purview.
In Administrative law there is an English case where a Municipality
which provided baths and wash houses to the ratepayers ventured to start
a laundry.
The court ruled that operating a laundry is extraneous to the main
function of the Municipality and therefore ultra vires. If the state bus
operations cannot be carried on without being a burden on the Treasury
some drastic action has to be taken, not excluding privatisation. No
state concern should employ redundant staff. |