More strength to the ICC
LET'S face it. Over the years the International Cricket Council (ICC)
has received enough flak from past cricketers and scribes alike who have
called them with every name that is possible under the sun and even
spited them on a number of occasions the way they have handled certain
issues connected with the game.
Despite all the razzmatazz, the ICC have continued to box on serving
the game for which is what they are there for.
The latest attack on cricket's ruling body comes former England Test
opener Geoff Boycott who launched a stinging criticism on the ICC for
allowing Bangladesh and Zimbabwe to continue playing Test cricket.
"I honestly believe the ICC should be ashamed of themselves for
allowing this devaluation of Test cricket to continue," Boycott said at
a lecture on the eve of the first Ashes Test between England and
Australia at Lord's.
"My mum would have scored runs and got wickets against Bangladesh ...
she'd have wanted to bat and bowl at both ends. They are an
embarrassment to Test cricket."
The ICC however had its reasons for not demoting the two countries
from Test membership. Ehsan Mani, the ICC president says in his annual
report of 2004-05: "There were also reports that Bangladesh and Zimbabwe
were to lose their Test status. This is simply not true. The ICC is
seeking to help these countries not punish them.
"No one should lose sight of the fact that cricket is the number one
sport in Bangladesh. The enthusiasm for cricket there should encourage
everyone who loves the game to support this fledgling nation as it
establishes itself among cricket's elite."
"There are also more junior cricket players in Zimbabwe than ever
before and it is to be expected that the structures being put in place
here will lead to an improvement at the elite level."
The ICC should be commended for standing firm on this issue despite
what others say and the pressures that have been brought on them to
change their stance on the two countries.
Talking of devaluing the game, has Boycott forgotten the time when
English cricket was at its low ebb and they were being beaten by all and
sundry? Is Boycott talking so loudly because there has been a resurgence
of the England side that they are capable of matching their wits with
even the top nation in the world Australia in the ongoing Ashes Test
contest?
The umpire is always right?
The fact that the ICC's international umpires have substantially
improved their correct decision making by as much as 3.1 percent in Test
cricket and 2.7 percent in One-day Internationals should bring a great
deal of confidence to the cricketers the world over and earn more
respect for the officials who conduct the game.
Figures released by the ICC's annual report show that in Tests
umpires have got it right 94.8 percent in the period 2004-05 compared to
91.7 percent in the previous year. In One-day Internationals the
corresponding figures are 93.4 percent in 2004-05 and 90.7 percent the
previous year.
As part of its comprehensive assessment of umpire performances, the
ICC's Cricket Operations department now analyses every appeal and
decision made in Test matches and One-day International cricket.
The figures are based on the correct decision-making percentages of
international umpires represented by the Elite panel and the
international panel of umpires.
US $ 500m on betting
Lord Condon, the head of ICC's Anti-Corruption and Security Unit in
his report for the year 2004-05 reveals that an estimated US$ 500
million changed hands through the illegal betting market during each of
the six one-day international matches during India's home series against
Pakistan.
"With this level of interest it is imperative that cricket remains
exceptionally vigilant," wrote Lord Condon and called for legislation on
betting in the sport, which he said would provide a more effective
framework for dealing with it.
He said that he was happy to note that during the year under review
there had been no major corruption scandals in international cricket and
one of the main reasons for it was the awareness created by the ICC on
the subject.
"One of the most effective weapons in the fight against corruption is
education," wrote Lord Condon. "The primary target of the ACSU's
education program is the players and all new international players are
briefed on the dangers of corruption." |