Edward Henry Pedris: great patriot
JULY 7th 2005 was the 90th death anniversary of the national hero
Edward Henry Pedris. The execution of Edward Henry Pedris by the British
was one of the most tragic events recorded in our 2,500 year history. It
was not only premeditated and planned but it was carried out under
Pedris was no ordinary person and he belonged to a very distinguished
family with very influential relatives who were all leading businessmen,
at that time in the heart of Pettah and was in 1915, the centre of all
business and commercial activity. His father Duenuge Disan Pedris was
one of the richest men in the country.
Apart form extensive sugar cane plantations I am personally aware
that he owned more than 120 very large residential properties in
Colombo. I am in possession of a House Rent receipt book that provides
evidence. At that time, they were the largest properties that one could
identify in Colombo.
His father in 1905, purchased the five acre property on which the
Isipathanarama Viharaya stands today and it has the largest Dagoba that
is only second to the Dagoba at the Kelaniya Temple.
The paintings in the Viharage have been done by M. Sarlis one of the
very best temple painters of that period.
The riots of 1915 had a lasting and indelible impression on the
people of Ceylon and it resulted in tremendous disenchantment with
British rule. For the generations that lived at that time in the
twenties and thirties, it was one of the most widely discussed tragic
The riots led to movements which spearheaded major changes in the
administration and politics of the country and was the precursor of the
To the present day younger generation these are little known facts
because the career of this illustrious patriot is, along with many
others who lived thereafter to put up a bold struggle for the
motherland, has not been referred to in the historical narratives that
have been made available to the younger generation.
Edward Henry Pedris was the only son in a family of five children.
His father had great hopes that he would one day take over his business
enterprises and become a leader in the commercial world. But these hopes
were short lived because the outbreak of the riots that started in
Gampola brought about his untimely execution.
Edward Henry Pedris was born on 16th August 1888 in Colombo. He first
attended the Colombo Academy situated in the Pettah. From the Colombo
Academy he joined St. Thomas' College where he excelled in sports and
shone out as a good cricketer, playing for the school's first eleven.
After some time he returned to Royal College, the former Colombo
Academy, and played cricket and engaged in other sports activities.
At both St Thomas and Royal he was a top scorer in the cricket team.
Pedris was a teetotaller and he had a wide circle of friends both in his
schooldays and thereafter.
The writings of E.W. Perera, Sir Ponnambalam Ramanathan, Armand De
Souza and A. E. Goonesinghe relating to this period give a major insight
into the events that took place during the riots and how the people
The people sought a full inquiry into the causes of the riots, the
methods used to suppress and inflict cruelty on the people, the
arbitrary punishment of offenders, the collection of funds for the
payment of compensation and the way the country was administered by the
British under martial law.
Although the Sinhalese asked for a Commission of Inquiry that request
was never granted. The British administration misjudged the riots and
was ruthless in suppressing the disturbances.
The Sinhalese community in their memorandum to the British Government
pointed out that the British had violated the undertakings given in the
Kandyan Convention of 1815, which was signed between the British
Government and the Kandyan chieftains to expressly protect the ancient
rights and privileges enjoyed by the Buddhists.
The licence was refused by the Government Agent. Thereafter the
Basnayake Nilame of the devale sued the Attorney General, Sir Anton
Bertram, for unlawfully denying him the right to hold the Perahera that
had been an immemorial privilege enjoyed by the Buddhists.
The case was heard before the district judge of Kandy, who after a
long drawn out trial found that the facts were in favour of the
plaintiff, the Basnayake Nilame. The Supreme Court, however reversed the
judgement and thereafter, an appeal was made to the Judicial Committee
of the Privy Council.
While this situation remained, on May 20th 1915, which was a Wesak
Day, two carol parties were licensed as usual to conduct their religious
processions on the streets of Kandy, subject to the condition that they
should not pass the newly built mosque on Castle Hill Street with music
To avoid conflict the carol parties kept to the terms of the
stipulations made by the Government Agent. However, there was hostility
between the two religious groups that resulted in the outbreak of
violence in and around Kandy, and it soon spread to Gampola, Matale,
Kurunegala and Kegalle.
However, no sooner the riots ended in Kandy there was an outbreak of
violence in Colombo that started in the Government Railway Workshops in
Maradana. These disturbances soon spread to the other parts of the City.
Although the acts of lawlessness spread from place to place, in cases
where timely action was taken to contain them the uprisings soon
subsided, as was evidenced in Badulla and Kurunegala.
But the British without making use of the powers given by the normal
laws of the country, proceeded to take the very extreme step of
proclaiming martial law in six provinces, in two of which their was no
violence or disorder at all.
Martial law was proclaimed on June 2nd and within 10 days normality
was restored through the rigour of the martial law in the provinces.
The British used untrained volunteers and many of them were employed
in the plantations and commercial establishments, shops and factories,
to suppress the riots and they went on to shoot hundreds of civilians
who had hardly anything to do with the riots.
The volunteers were of unsuited temperament and they went all over
the country accompanied by Punjabi soldiers unleashing a reign of terror
in the villages. However, martial law continued until August 30, 1915,
long after the riots had ended.
The authorities misconstrued the situation and thought that this was
an uprising against British rule and they did not take the trouble to
consult the leaders of the different communities in the Island. The
views and opinions of the Sinhala leaders would have been invaluable for
a correct understanding of what had happened during the riots.
More so especially since the British Governor Sir Robert Chalmers and
Sir Anton Bertram had arrived recently in the island. The government
gave ear to false reports and rumours that were circulated by
irresponsible individuals in regard to the origin and aims of the riots.
In no way was it a deliberate and organised attempt by the Sinhalese
people to defy the British government and this was proved by the fact
that no British military officer was attacked by the rioters and no
government property was damaged and no European living in the remotest
parts in the island had suffered from violence.
The most drastic and rigorous restriction and prohibitions were
imposed on the people and most of them were innocent.
One such regulation was that any person not obeying orders was liable
to be shot at sight. People were warned that they should remain in their
villages throughout the period of the martial law. Village headmen were
taken hostage to ensure that people remained in the villages.
In the case of Edward Henry Pedris the main issue was that he was
accused, without any supporting evidence of having shot at a Muslim mob
in the Pettah. Another fabricated story was that he had incited people
to march to the city of Colombo from Peliyagoda.
Soon after his arrest and incarceration he was tried by a military
court as civil courts had been abandoned and all civil cases tried by a
court martial of three or five military officials. Pedris was tried by a
special court of three military officials and was immediately sentenced
Chalmers passed on the decision to confirm the death sentence to
Brigadier General Malcolm who was all powerful at that time. Chalmers
stated that it was not necessary for him to intervene as he had
entrusted all duties to the military.
The only person who was able to intervene in this case was Sir Hector
Van Cuylenberg who was the elected representative in the legislature,
but his representations were not taken seriously by the military. Many
leading citizens and educationists and others like sir Ponnambalam
Ramanathan also intervened without any impact.
It was E. W. Perera who has been long forgotten as a great national
patriot and hero, who made represeanations against the atrocities
committed by the British and took up the cases of the Ceylonese who had
been imprisoned or shot dead during the riots.
He had to leave for England by ship amid the war at a time when
hundreds of ships were being sunk in the Mediterranean and Atlantic
Oceans by German submarines.
He had to carry in his shoe the infamous order issued by Inspector
General H. L. L. Dowbigging known as the "shoot at sight" order that
later figured in the debates in the House of Commons.
E. W. Perera was assisted in London by D. B. Jayatilake that resulted
in the British Government introducing reforms and concessions after
1918, but it also led to the recall of Governor Chalmers and the
retirement of Brigadier General Malcolm.
Chalmers was succeeded by the very benevolent British Governor Sir
John Anderson who was very sympathetic towards the Ceylonese. Sir John
Anderson took up the position that the execution of Edward Henry Pedris
was an act of grave injustice and was totally unwarranted and he added.
"that there was evidence which could have saved Pedris".