Resolve problems in higher education
The majority of the public is likely to
agree with President Kumaratunga that "stringent changes" or reforms
should be introduced to Sri Lanka's higher educational sphere.
In fact, the President has done well to clarify some contentious
issues in this area of concern over the past few months and we could
only hope that wise counsel would prevail in the handling of these
questions among those in authority.
The stark truth is that 97 percent of students who qualify for
university entry at the G.C.E. Advanced Level examination are not in a
position to avail of a higher education on account of the extremely
limited number of students who are absorbed each year into our
universities. Thus the vast number of our students are - for no fault of
theirs - not in a position to fulfill a very vital human need which is,
in fact, an inalienable right.
Unfortunately, not all sections of the polity recognize this as a
glaring anomaly which needs to be put right through the adoption of
pragmatic measures. As suggested by the President, these sections are
dabbling in or splitting hairs over abstract theoretical issues without
formulating some implementable practical measures which would enable the
State to provide every student who qualifies at the G.C.E. Advanced
Level examination a fair chance of pursuing a higher education.
They would seek to maximize their political gains over these issues
rather than ease the heartburn suffered by these hapless students and
their parents. The time is ripe, however, to abandon tired and
threadbare political shibboleths over these questions. One way out, as
the President herself suggests, is to permit foreign universities to
open some of their faculties here.
A second way out is to permit the functioning of private degree
awarding local higher educational institutions. It should be noted that
we are not without a few such institutions which are on par with any of
the traditional State universities.
Besides paving the way for granting the right to pursue a higher
education to a substantial number of our students, this measure would
enable the country to save a massive amount of valuable foreign
exchange, which would otherwise be drained out of the country as a
result of parents and elders spending lavishly on their children's
education in foreign universities.
In any case, quite a few local educational institutions, providing
post secondary education, are already tied up with some foreign
universities. These innovations in higher education wouldn't, therefore,
be revolutionary by any means.
It is important that we explore all such practical means to resolve
these long-smouldering issues in higher education. Let's not split-hairs
while the future of our youth is irrevocably destroyed. |