Opportunities before Sonia Gandhi
BY HARISH Khare
THE organisational elections provide Sonia Gandhi a chance to provide
a face-lift to the Congress.
Chairperson of India’s United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government
Sonia Gandhi (R) is watched by Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh
as she addresses a gathering during a ceremony marking the
completion of one year of governance in New Delhi.(AFP) |
If everything goes well, and according to script, Sonia Gandhi will
in a few days be declared to have been re-elected unopposed as president
of the Indian National Congress.
Though the purist may find her "election" a less-than-perfect
exercise in internal party democracy, her anointment for four more years
will be in perfect harmony with the mood and balance of forces within
the organisation.
Even before the 2004 Lok Sabha elections, there were no pockets of
resistance to her supremacy; an unenthusiastic acceptance of her
leadership gave way to an inspired surrender after she led the party to
victory last May.
And, ever since she performed the rites of renunciation and handed
over the prime ministerial crown to Manmohan Singh, she has risen to the
status of unquestionable leader. To that extent, the absence of a
contest merely reflects the overwhelming respect and support she enjoys
in the party.
However, the matter does not end - nor should it be allowed to end -
with Ms. Gandhi's election because the internal election process in a
political party is not confined to the selection of the leader.
A political party is not a private arrangement between the leader and
the followers, though most political parties in India do seem to be
organised as an extension of the "leader."
A political party is a public institution; and though Indian
political parties and their leaders claim to speak in the name of the
masses, internal affairs of political parties remain, by and large,
outside the realm of legal scrutiny.
Except for a questionable leverage the Election Commission has tried
to invoke infrequently, no other lawful authority has any supervisory
power that can be used to make the political parties act internally in a
transparent or democratic manner.
The Congress too has gone through the motions of conducting an
internal election whose outcome was known from the very beginning; this
limited exercise nonetheless would meet the technical demands made by
the Election Commission.
But a sound democracy does not thrive on technicalities alone. And
the Congress has too critical and too central a role in sustaining and
deepening the party system in India for its leadership to feel satisfied
with technicalities.
It is a sine quo non that the Congress conduct its internal affairs
in a manner that enhances and deepens its institutional capacities to
function as the premier pan-Indian political party, which in turn
functions as the cornerstone of the Indian state order. And it is here
that Ms. Gandhi has yet again wasted an opportunity.
It cannot be anybody's contention that the Congress liabilities have
suddenly reduced or that its assets have improved dramatically just
because of her tyag (sacrifice) or because it is again saddled with the
task of operating the Centre, as the largest constituent of the ruling
United Progressive Alliance. Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Tamil Nadu, and West
Bengal remain impervious to her new moral aura.
A healthy party system in a functioning democratic arrangement has to
perform a number of tasks: it must participate in the selection of a
governing elite; it should articulate and aggregate the thinking and
demands of its support constituency; and, above all, in a developing
country like ours, a political party must become an instrument of
opportunity and upward mobility for all sections of society.
Which sections it should woo and which demands it must press depend
on the party's history of ideological pretensions, as well as on the
predilections of those who come to capture the leadership slots.
Admittedly, every party tends to become a prisoner of its current
crop of leaders from the very top down to the block level.
Those who find themselves on the inside use every bureaucratic device
to protect and perpetuate their place under the organisational sun;
there is an intrinsically built-in status quo-ist bias in party
organisations. However, if a party has to remain a vibrant organisation
then it is obliged to shake itself up from time to time.
Organisational elections provide a legitimate avenue for cadres and
activists to renew their ties with the party as well as to have their
say in the matter of leadership.
The just concluded organisational election was an excellent
opportunity for the Congress to renew itself.
Organisational elections become the occasion as well as the
provocation for launching membership drives; if carried out honestly,
the exercise can help a party realign itself with new social forces,
enlarging its catchment area, and tap their new energy and aspirations.
Ms. Gandhi herself had given hints that she was alive to the obligation.
Addressing the Congress Parliamentary Party on February 25, 2005, she
had said: "we are in the midst of organisational elections. We are
firmly committed to completing elections up to the AICC levels by April
30th. I would urge all of you to actively participate in this process.
This is a time to implement what I have often emphasised, and that is
to bring in young men and women from all walks of life, particularly
from the weaker sections of society in much larger numbers."
That opportunity has been missed. Instead of allowing a genuine
democratic churning to take place, the party establishment looked the
other way as State and district leaders suborned the "membership
enrolment drive"; this too was perhaps inevitable as top leaders have
bargained among themselves to divide "PRO/DRO"(Pradesh returning
officers/district returning officers).
They have in the process ensured a "dependable" Electoral College for
the president; and, these selected, rather than elected `delegates" for
the Electoral College, in turn get used as instruments for packing the
AICC. And, the AICC gets to elect the Congress Working Committee.
The circle of inbreeding is complete. So, now we have the deliciously
absurd spectacle where the Pradesh delegates are deemed to have been
"elected" in all States, but the electoral process at the block and
district level is yet to get off the ground.
Though an opportunity has been botched, the "elections" do provide an
occasion to whip the party into shape. Ms. Gandhi gets a licence to
re-arrange the party's hierarchy.
There will be a new working committee of the "elected" and the
"nominated" categories and together the two form the party's highest
decision-making body. Most probably a "consensus" would get manufactured
that working committee elections be avoided and the party president be
authorised to name members in both categories.
It is understandable that Ms. Gandhi and her managers would want to
put in place a loyal working committee but this concern for loyalty
should not become an excuse for picking up incompetent, unhelpful,
politically-challenged men and women; the CWC must once again become a
body of the finest political minds in the party. And, in any case, a
group of 24 individuals is too large a forum for any meaningful
discussion.
It is time the Parliamentary Board is revived. In picking a new
hierarchy, Ms. Gandhi will be called upon to exhibit one particular
leadership quality: the capacity to infuse new blood as well as to chop
down deadwood.
It must be realised that irrespective of its past services and
loyalties the old guard is not only an anachronism but a positive
hindrance to the Congress' evolution as a party tuned into the modern
age and its irreverent inclinations.
This re-casting of the party hierarchy becomes all the more necessary
because the Congress has to re-orient itself for its new assignment as
the leader of a coalition government at the Centre. Because the Congress
president chose to stay away from the government, the party finds itself
having to come to terms with a kind of "division of labour."
So far the party establishment has been found out to be without the
requisite intellectual or even political competence to be able to guide
the government in terms of priorities and policies.
The only creative inputs have come from outside the party and outside
the government, the National Advisory Council. It is obvious that the
party has to promote competence within its ranks, especially at the
level of the AICC secretariat.
It can only be hoped that Ms. Gandhi would have by now realised the
futility of packing up crucial party forums with family retainers or
professional sycophants.
There is no longer any need for her to persist with her noblesse
oblige instincts of wanting to carrying everyone along; this otherwise
unexceptionable habit has more often than not produced paralysis at the
heart of decision-making.
She and the rest of the party have to appreciate that with Dr.
Manmohan Singh presiding over South Block, the Congress has got another
chance to woo the middle classes with their preference for decorum in
public life.
This incipient love affair will run into trouble unless Ms. Gandhi is
able to provide a face-lift to the Congress. She gets one more
opportunity.
Courtesy - The Hindu |