Curb parent power, say heads
by Rebecca Smithers
Handing more power to parents over school policy could be like
putting "an alcoholic in charge of a bar", a headteachers' leader warned
yesterday. David Hart, the outgoing general secretary of the National
Association of Head Teachers, said behaviour in schools was getting
worse because parents are failing to teach their children basic social
standards. Too many are sending their five-year olds to school unable to
hold a knife and fork and without being toilet-trained, he said.
The education secretary, Ruth Kelly, has made "parent power" a
central theme of Labour's education policies since her appointment last
December.
But Mr Hart questioned the wisdom of this policy, even proposing a
radical slimming down of governing bodies which would hand back more
powers to headteachers and their senior staff and dilute parental
representation.
In his speech at the close of the association's annual conference in
Telford, Shropshire, Mr Hart said: "The government's attempt to
reinforce the role of parents is a key political strategy. But there is
a danger that it sends the wrong message. One that has parent power, not
parental responsibility, written all over it."
Mr Hart said one of headteachers' biggest concerns was "the number of
pupils who lack basic social standards".
Attributing worsening pupil behaviour to poor parenting, he said all
parents should sign up to basic standards, including respect for school
staff and a recognition that violence, verbal threats and abuse were
unacceptable: "These seem to me to be the minimum standards that our
members are entitled to expect their pupils and their parents to
observe. And by the way giving more power to those parents who lack
responsibility is like putting an alcoholic in charge of a bar."
Mr Hart praised the role played by school governors - the largest
sector of volunteers in the public sector - but called for a restructure
of governing bodies. "I would suggest that governing bodies are too
large, too overloaded with parents and lumbered with too many categories
of governor," he said.
Governing bodies can have up to 20 governors, with a third or more of
them parents. But Mr Hart said these parents typically failed to speak
for the entire parent body: "Most parents are understandably more
interested in the needs of their own children.
An advisory council, elected by the parents' body, might well produce
a more effective parental representation."
Governing bodies should concentrate solely on their overall strategic
responsibilities, leaving the job of leading and managing the school to
the headteacher, the effective "chief executive".
Mr Hart focused on the familiar theme of violence and abuse from both
pupils and parents, which has dominated the Naht's conference: "Violence
is completely and utterly unacceptable. So are verbal threats, physical
threats, verbal abuse, foul language, harassment and bullying by parents
towards heads and their staffs."
In his final speech to the conference after 27 years as general
secretary, Mr Hart also issued a passionate plea to his membership to
put an end to their internal war over the government's so-called
"workload agreement" which aims to give all teachers a guaranteed
half-day a week out of the classroom for marking and preparation.
Members are deeply divided over the agreement, and many have warned they
will be unable to implement it because no extra money has been provided.
Earlier, Sir Digby Jones, director general of the CBI, told the
conference that youngsters must be taught to take risks, lose races and
sit exams they can fail. He warned that Britain was creating a nation of
"victims" who blame other people for their failures.
The UK would fall behind economic rivals such as China and India
unless children are taught to take a chance, he told delegates.
"We are all taking part in something of a deceit because we are
teaching the next generation that risk doesn't exist," he said. "We are
saying to them, you can have rights until they are coming out of your
pores. But responsibilities, taking charge of your own actions? Taking
charge of your children's actions if you are a parent? We don't seem to
have got it."
- The Guardian |