Be
passionless
Make an island unto yourself. Strive
without delay; become wise. Purged of stain and passionless you will not
come again to birth and old age. Mala Vagga - The Dhammapada
Some thoughts on negative thinking
by Kingsley Heendeniya
The Buddha teaches, among other things, about inclinations of the
mind; and He constantly recommends abandoning and abstaining from them.
Make an island unto yourself |
"I do not, monks, see any other single thing that so leads to the
arising of unskillful things [akusala], or to the growth and development
of unskillful that have arisen as wrong view. I do not, monks, see any
other single thing that so leads to the non-arising of skillful [kusala]
things that have not arisen, or to the decline of skillful things that
have arisen, as wrong view" [Anguttara].
'Just as the dawn heralds and foretells the rising of the sun, so
right view [sammaditthi] heralds and foretells the penetration to the
Four Noble Truths, according as they really are.' [Sariputta, Sn. 56.37]
Let me try to help you to understand these words of the Master and
His foremost pupil that lead onwards [opanayiko] to a particular insight
of the Dhamma. In consideration of space, I shall necessarily be
concise.
Consciousness [vinnana] differentiates the animate or the sentient
from the inanimate. In the Teaching, there is no subdivision into
[false] sub-consciousness and un-consciousness states as taught by
psychologists. We are conscious all the time, when sleeping and
dreaming, and when even in the so-called 'vegetative state' after say,
brain injury, until it ceases at death.
Consciousness arises from, and is dependent on the six internal bases
[ayatana] - eye, ear, nose, tongue, body and mind. With their
counterparts or percepts of visible form, sound, smell, taste, touch and
ideas, they are the six kinds of vinnana that inherent in all living
beings. Understanding vinnana as thus taught by the Buddha in this
exegesis is fundamental to arrive at insight of His Teaching. Any other
is wrong view.
Consciousness is therefore intentional, purposive or teleological.
Thus understanding vinnana necessarily leads to understanding of
intentions or cetana - which leads to other things. No understanding is
however possible if one does not always ask the question: 'Why did the
Buddha put it this way?' That is why dhamma-vicaya
[investigation-of-things] is the second of seven factors [bojjhanga]
leading to enlightenment.
It is done from a backdrop of the first, mindfulness [sati].
Discursive thinking has ceased - and anapanasati is helpful though not
essential. What is essential is the mode of mindfulness and awareness [satisampajanna].
This is the way Dhamma is practised. Scholarship, learning and repeating
things parrot-wise cannot lead from inferential knowledge to insight and
experiencing the Teaching.
Let me now discuss negative thinking assuming the reader is familiar
with the actual words of the Buddha as found in the suttas. But first,
let us examine what others have said on the subject, chiefly the
existentialist thinkers such as Heidegger, Husserl, Sartre, Kierkegaard
where their mode of thinking and analysis is essentially satisampajanna
- being in the present by reflexion upon the immediate experience.
Pulling back, or re-observing the immediate experience is reflexion or
awareness.
Reflection contains reflexion; but on the other hand, there is no
reflection in reflexion. Long before the existentialist thinkers, the
Buddha said, 'But, Udayi, let be the past, let be the future, I shall
set you forth the Teaching: When there is this this is, with the arising
of this this arises; when there is not this this is not, with the
cessation of this this ceases.' It is a statement from negative thinking
at the nuclear level. It is arisen from the seminal insight of the
Buddha: the fundamental structure of dependent arising and cessation [paticcasamuppada].
A determination or intention, says Spinoza, is essentially negative.
A negative or negation exists as a denial of the positive but it ipso
facto affirms its existence. The Buddha thus framed the first noble in
the negative: 'There is dukkha', affirming that the positive
parama-sukha [Nibbana] exists. Dukkha is the present: 'When there is
this [craving] this is [dukkha]'.
He did not frame it: 'There is parama-sukha' since if the positive [Nibbana]
were evident there would have been no need for a Buddha to arise. If the
man enjoying the pleasures of the senses from craving knew that
extinction of craving is the purpose of existing, we should then all
have become Buddha.
Kierkegaard says: 'Negative thinkers therefore have one advantage, in
that they have something positive, being aware of the negative element
in existence; the positive have nothing at all, since they are
deceived...But the genuine subjective existing thinker is always as
negative as he is positive, and vice versa.
Let us examine the structure of a sutta such as the Sammaditthi Sutta
by venerable Sariputta or its more definitive construction, 'The
Discourse on the Great Forty' by the Master himself.
Sariputta teaches 16 ways of arriving at right view and begins by
describing unskillful action - the negative present everywhere in
existence. 'And what, friends, is the unskillful, the root of the
unskillful? What is the skillful, what is the root of the skillful?
Killing living beings, taking what is not given, misconduct in
sensual pleasures, false speech, malicious speech, harsh speech, gossip,
covetousness, ill will, wrong view, is unskillful. This is called the
unskillful.' They are the inclinations the Buddha speaks about. They
deny the existence of positive intentions of not killing living beings
etc but affirm that positive intentions or cetana of not killing living
beings exist.
Thus the Dhamma is about abandoning, about abstaining and letting go
of inclinations. There is no exhortation to give succor to life and
promote continued existence of living beings. For example, the Buddha
always put away what was left over after a meal where no life exists. He
did not feed it to a cat or a rat.
Space limits me from developing this line of investigating the Dhamma.
Unlike Saint Ignatius Loyola who says that 'the sacrifice of the
intellect is pleasing to God', the Buddha insists that his teaching
should be scrutinized, adding from his own experience that it cannot be
realised by reasoning alone.
That is to say, intentions of abandoning negative intentions leading
to cessation of both negative and positive intentions cannot be reached
by mere inferential thinking. True knowledge, from cessation of
reference by inference from an alleged self is directly intuitive. It is
hidden by the negative that is present everywhere.
This is the essence of the teaching of Bahiya when the wise man met
the Buddha on the road while on alms round. 'When for you, Bahiya, in
the seen is only the seen, in the heard is only the heard, in the sensed
is only the sensed, in the cognized is only the cognized, then you shall
neither be here [in the internal base] nor there [in the external
percepts], nor in between the two [in consciousness].
It is the end of dukkha'. In other words, 'When there is not this
this is not; with cessation of this this ceases.' Dependent arising -
dependent on impact of the six senses, of both the negative and the
positive upon a non-existent self - has ceased [phassanirodha]. It is
the end of ethics, of negative and positive thinking.
###############
Kucchivikara vattu - the monk with dysentery
Even unpleasant people need to be cared for when they are ill. In
this sermon, the Buddha tells us to care for anyone who needs our help,
and goes on to describe how to be a good patient and a good nurse.
Now, at that time a certain monk was sick with dysentery. He lay
fouled in his own urine and excrement. Then the Blessed One, on an
inspection tour of the lodgings with Ven. Ananda as his attendant, went
to that monk's dwelling and, on arrival, saw the monk lying fouled in
his own urine and excrement. On seeing him, he went to the monk and
said, "What is your sickness, monk?"
"I have dysentery, O Blessed One."
"But do you have an attendant?"
"No, O Blessed One."
"Then why don't the monks attend to you?"
"I don't do anything for the monks, lord, which is why they don't
attend to me."
Then the Blessed One addressed Ven. Ananda: "Go fetch some water,
Ananda. We will wash this monk."
"As you say, lord," Ven. Ananda replied, and he fetched some water.
The Blessed One sprinkled water on the monk, and Ven. Ananda washed him
off. Then - with the Blessed One taking the monk by the head, and Ven.
Ananda taking him by the feet - they lifted him up and placed him on a
bed.
Then the Blessed One, from this cause, because of this event, had the
monks assembled and asked them: "Is there a sick monk in that dwelling
over there?"
"Yes, O Blessed One, there is."
"And what is his sickness?"
"He has dysentery, O Blessed One."
"But does he have an attendant?"
"No, O Blessed One."
"Then why don't the monks attend to him?"
"He doesn't do anything for the monks, Lord, which is why they don't
attend to him."
"Monks, you have no mother, you have no father, who might tend to
you. If you don't tend to one another, who then will tend to you?
Whoever would tend to me, should tend to the sick.
"If one's preceptor is present, the preceptor should tend to one as
long as life lasts, and should stay until one's recovery. If one's
teacher is present, the teacher should tend to one as long as life
lasts, and should stay until one's recovery.
If one's student is present, the student should tend to one as long
as life lasts, and should stay until one's recovery. If one's apprentice
is present, the apprentice should tend to one as long as life lasts, and
should stay until one's recovery.
If one who is a fellow student of one's preceptor is present, the
fellow student of one's preceptor should tend to one as long as life
lasts, and should stay until one's recovery. If one who is a fellow
apprentice of one's teacher is present, the fellow apprentice of one's
teacher should tend to one as long as life lasts, and should stay until
one's recovery.
If no preceptor, teacher, student, apprentice, fellow student of
one's preceptor, or fellow apprentice of one's teacher is present, the
sangha should tend to one. If it does not, (all the monks in that
community) incur an offence of wrong-doing.
"A sick person endowed with five qualities is hard to tend to: he
does what is not amenable to his cure; he does not know the proper
amount in things amenable to his cure; he does not take his medicine; he
does not tell his symptoms, as they actually are present, to the nurse
desiring his welfare, saying that they are worse when they are worse,
improving when they are improving, or remaining the same when they are
remaining the same; and he is not the type who can endure bodily
feelings that are painful, fierce, sharp, wracking, repellent,
disagreeable, life-threatening. A sick person endowed with these five
qualities is hard to tend to.
"A sick person endowed with five qualities is easy to tend to: he
does what is amenable to his cure; he knows the proper amount in things
amenable to his cure; he takes his medicine; he tells his symptoms, as
they actually are present, to the nurse desiring his welfare, saying
that they are worse when they are worse, improving when they are
improving, or remaining the same when they are remaining the same; and
he is the type who can endure bodily feelings that are painful, fierce,
sharp, wracking, repellent, disagreeable, life-threatening. A sick
person endowed with these five qualities is easy to tend to.
"A nurse endowed with five qualities is not fit to tend to the sick:
He is not competent at mixing medicine; he does not know what is
amenable or unamenable to the patient's cure, bringing to the patient
things that are unamenable and taking away things that are amenable; he
is motivated by material gain, not by thoughts of goodwill; he gets
disgusted at cleaning up excrement, urine, saliva, or vomit; and he is
not competent at instructing, urging, rousing, and encouraging the sick
person at the proper occasions with a talk on Dhamma.
A nurse endowed with these five qualities is not fit to tend to the
sick. "A nurse endowed with five qualities is fit to tend to the sick:
He is competent at mixing medicine; he knows what is amenable or
unamenable to the patient's cure, taking away things that are unamenable
and bringing things that are amenable; he is motivated by thoughts of
goodwill, not by material gain; he does not get disgusted at cleaning up
excrement, urine, saliva, or vomit; and he is competent at instructing,
urging, rousing, and encouraging the sick person at the proper occasions
with a talk on Dhamma. A nurse endowed with these five qualities is fit
to tend to the sick."
- Translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu
###############
Reflection on the Buddhist Global Conference
New Buddhist relief organisation - a cornerstone of compassion
by Rev. Dhammaruchi, USA
On March 19 and 20, Saturday and Sunday, my master, Bhante Chao Chu;
my Dhamma brother, Dhammapala, and I attended the Buddhist Global
Conference. After two days of dialogue, at the BMICH, in Colombo, Sri
Lanka, the participants of the Buddhist Global Conference adopted a
resolution assigning an Interim Organizing Committee comprised of Sri
Lankan and international Buddhist representatives with the
responsibility of presenting a draft constitution for a new Buddhist
relief organization within the next three months.
The Interim Organizing Committee is headed by Dr. Hema Goonatilake
and Olcott Gunaserkera. The Conference entitled Buddhist Humanitarian
Services in a Post-Tsunami Context was well attended with over five
hundred monastic, cleric, and lay participants, and headed by the Most
Venerable Mahanayaka Theras.
The new relief organization, which will be similar to the Red
Crescent or Red Cross, has as its objective the establishing of a
world-wide network of Buddhist humanitarian services to facilitate more
effective charitable efforts through the entire world.
The new organization will work tirelessly to coordinate humanitarian
services at the national and international level. It has been suggested
that the new organization, which is expected to be operational by the
end of March 2006, incorporate a practical plan for utilizing the
international organizational facilities of the World Fellowship of
Buddhists (WFB), now based in Bangkok. The WFB was founded in 1950 by
Dr. Gunapala Malalasekera.
The need for such a relief organization became clear with the tsunami
disaster, and the efforts exhibited by the BhikkhusŸ?(tm) as well as the
Buddhist laity proved that the world Buddhist community is up to the
task.
The actions by the temples to throw their doors wide open to anyone
seeking help, regardless of their religion, ethnicity or national
origin, displayed to the entire world the true spirit of Buddhism.
I would personally like to salute one particular tsunami hero, Ven.
Telwatte Nanda Tissa Thero. His example of courage during this disaster
was the embodiment of Buddhist selflessness and compassion, and one
which we would all be wise to emulate.
As the story was told to me: Venerable was in his temple leading a
Dhamma discussion, when a young boy came running in shouting about a big
wave. Of course, all the adults thought the child was just playing and
imagining. But seconds later they realized what he was saying. Venerable
Nanda Tissa mobilized everyone present to hurry out and help. He swam
and waded into deep water to rescue victims.
He went to an overturned passenger bus, where the people inside were
at risk of drowning, and broke windows with his bare hands to help the
victims escape certain death. He brought the injured to the safety of
his temple bandaged their wounds and helped transport them to the
hospital.
During one of the breaks at the conference, I had the privilege of
talking with some of the younger monks and nuns in attendance; and, if
the youthful enthusiasm of these young monastics, in addition to the
enthusiasm of the young Buddhist laymen and laywomen I met, is any
indication of the quality of the next generation of Buddhist leaders,
then the Buddhist tradition is in great shape!
Having said this, I believe that those of us who are older must
resolve to plot the course they will traverse. And one of the best
things we can do for their posterity, as well as ours, is to lay the
ground work for a relief organization like this.
And, of course, if these young people have the ethical Buddhist core
of Ven. Telwatte Nanda Tissa Thera, and Buddhists like him, this relief
organization will one day be a cornerstone of compassion in the world. |