Ganguly ban upheld as appeal fails
LONDON, April 17 (AFP) - India captain Sourav Ganguly's appeal
against a six-match one-day international ban was rejected by the
International Cricket Council (ICC) on Sunday.
However the world governing body said, in view of the disruption
caused by the uncertainty over Ganguly's availability, the last two
matches of the recently concluded six-match series against Pakistan
would count as the first two games of the ban.
The remainder of the ban should take effect during India's
participation in August's triangular one-day series in Sri Lanka, also
featuring the West Indies.
Ganguly was appealing against a sentence imposed by match referee
Chris Broad. The former England batsman, who had already fined him 70
percent of his match fee for the team's slow over-rate in the third
international in Jamshedpur, imposed the ban after India fell three
overs short in the following match in Ahmedabad on Tuesday.
Pakistan won both matches to square the series at 2-2 before going on
to win 4-2 after a 159-run victory at New Delhi on Sunday a match
batsman Ganguly missed, even though as his appeal was pending he was
eligible to play, following poor recent form.. ICC appeals commissioner
Michael Beloff endorsed Broad's decision in a 23-page written judgment
provided to the India captain earlier Sunday.
In his judgment Beloff, a leading English lawyer, said he did not
accept the argument put forward by Ganguly that heat was the reason for
failing to achieve the over rates.
"Cricket is a game played in all kinds of climates; it cannot be
right that the mere fact of the heat and humidity will excuse a failure
to achieve the minimum over rate," his judgment said.
Ganguly had requested the hearing be heard via video-conference link.
It was via such a link that he won an appeal in November against a
previous ICC decision to suspend him from two Test matches for a similar
offence during a one-dayer against Pakistan at Calcutta's Eden Gardens.
However, Beloff heard the appeal based on written submissions but
stressed: "It must be recalled that natural justice does not
automatically require an oral hearing."
ICC chief executive Malcolm Speed, explaining the decision to take
the last two games of the India-Pakistan series as the first two games
of the ban, said: "The initial decision of the match referee to impose
this ban clearly had an impact on the ability of the Indian team to
determine and select the make-up of its side.
"In light of this, the last two matches of India's series against
Pakistan, where the possible suspension of the Indian captain impacted
on the selection decisions of the (Indian) Board, will count as the
first two matches served under this sentence."
Ganguly has no further right of appeal within the ICC as their Code
of Conduct states that the decision of the appeals commissioner shall be
final and binding. |