SC directs CEA to formulate,
implement Community Noise Level Standard
by Wasantha Ramanayake
The Supreme Court recently directed the Central Environmental
Authority to formulate and implement the Community Noise Level Standard
as early as possible. The Bench comprised Chief Justice Sarath N. Silva
PC and Justices Nimal Gamini Amaratunga and Saleem Marsoof PC.
The court made the direction following the submissions by Deputy
Solicitor General Mrs. Bimba Thilakaratne who informed the court that
the Central Environmental Authority (CEA) was in the process of
formulating a Community Noise Level Standards to impose sound limits in
urban and residential areas. The DSG submitted that the matter was of
public importance since there were several cases pending before the
court. However, she submitted, according to her instructions the
formulation of the standards would take time.
The DSG further submitted that the standards had been already laid
down in respect of the industrial noise could not be used in respect of
community noise. She appeared for the added sixth respondent, the CEA in
the fundamental rights application filed by five trustees of Weligama
Jumma Mosque against the time limiting imposed by the Weligama Police in
the use of loudspeakers in calls for prayers.
Senior State Counsel Indika Demuni de Silva for the second respondent
ASP Weligama submitted that the permit had been issued to the
petitioners was limited to three minutes each for the different sessions
of calls for prayer and such limitations had been made in view of
problems between mosques and complaints received by the public.
President's Counsel Ikram Mohamed for the petitioners submitted that
if the call of prayer permit was increased from three minutes to five
minutes for each session and the Jumma prayer for one hour with the
period of call being at the usual level of volume and the continued
period of prayer at reduced level of volume, the petitioners would be
satisfied.
The Senior State Counsel submitted that she would obtain instructions
from the second respondent whether such a scheme could be implemented
and intimate the court on May 2 .
The case will be mentioned on May 2. |