The wisdom war
by Maya Jayapal
I read an article recently which referred to the observation that
women's brains are about 10% smaller than men's. Also a French scientist
about a century ago had apparently concluded, in all his wisdom, that
the small size of the brains explained the fickleness, inconstancy,
absence of thought and logic and incapacity to reason in women.
Although the gentleman who referred to the first remark has since
eaten his words, I can think of several males who would say Ah! I knew
that! However, I wonder whether such provocative statements should be
made at all. Has it been proved beyond any reasonable doubt? To a
society that is trying to promote equal opportunity for all human
beings, this comes as a slap in the face. To me it is similar to saying
that women are more caring and intuitive. I have seen many men with
those qualities. I remember with affectionate gratitude the male nurses
who cared for my father in his last days, the concern in his
cardiologists face when he performed his operation. Let us, therefore
not fall into the pit of generalisation.
And yet language points to that way of thinking too. When we want to
be derogatory we use the words, pea brain or bird brain. We totally
ignore the potent protein punch that minuscule legume packs or the
perspicacity of our feathered friends. Who has not heard the famous
fable about the jackdaw that got the last bit of water from the jug? And
who does not allude to the bespectacled owl as the fount of all wisdom?
In my view books such as 'Men are from Mars' and 'Women from Venus'
should be read from the point of view of explanation leading to
compassion rather than to highlight the differences. After all,
compatibility means acknowledging, appreciating and working with the
differences, otherwise a world of clones would indeed be a boring world.
It is the function, not the form that we should be looking at. But
men who in every other way epitomise kindness and perceptiveness will in
weak moments allude to the non-professionalism of women who are, after
all, housewives.
They forget that running a house brings in all the managerial skills
that a so-called profession entails- administrative, multitasking,
budgeting, operational procedures, creativeness, humour, delegation and
training, counselling and supervision, etc. And all this with love and
compassion, with no expectation of recognition or reward. What a wife
does in the house will be evident-and hopefully appreciated- only if she
decides not to do it.
Small can also mean beautiful and powerful as the immemorial story of
David and Goliath will prove.
Is it cultural or societal conditioning that regulates such thinking?
Just like our giving cars and scooters to boys and dolls that flutter
their eyelashes to girls.
So let us remember that it is usage and cognition that matter, not
the substance alone. And let us celebrate the differences and like the
French say: Vive la difference., for the differences certainly make for
enjoyment, compatibility and excitement.
(Courtesy-Deccan Herald) |