Thursday, 9 January 2003 |
Features |
News Business Features Editorial Security Politics World Letters Sports Obituaries |
Women living in South-Asia Out of Focus by Nimanthi Perera-Rajasingham With the coming of a New Year, it is important to also reflect on whether changes for women have become momentous and far-reaching. It seems that globalization has definitely affected our capacity for movement. Boundaries that have kept communities isolated or separated from other communities have supposedly fallen away, leaving all citizens with the capacity for greater mobility. Definitely it seems that people move around the world, work and live as they have never done before. Being an Indian or a Sri Lankan does not matter for a certain class, and they can live, and work anywhere. Yet, to make such bold statements seems more than na There was great speculation that suggested he was only going out with
her because she was white and so obviously easy. Then others commented
that she merely wanted to have a fling with a local, "slumming"
while she was in India. Inter cultural mixing, still seems taboo and
society is still reluctant to accept people who desire to breakthrough
boundaries of caste, race and religion.
Here is another example of how women have to constantly live under
censorship. When I moved to India, I had decided with two other friends to
move to a flat of our own. My first memories of living in Delhi are of
trudging through the neighbourhood looking for flats to move into.
Constantly an agent showed us a flat, but when we met the landlord, he was
extremely reluctant to allow three women move in. It took us nearly two
months to find accommodation where we were allowed a measure of space, and
that too because the landlord lived miles away and wasn't really concerned
with what was happening at his flat.
Of course there are many other ways in which women's movement is still
restricted in this part of the world and globally. We cannot still wear
what we want in the streets, we are restricted from various kinds of
actions, and living alone for a South Asian woman can still be an issue.
Yet, what gains have we obtained in the last few years? In India I
found that the feminist front was active, vociferous and extremely
intense. Living there has been inspirational to me rather than
disappointing. I found that if I looked beyond the clich,s and obvious
restrictions, a whole new world of women doing good work opened up to me.
I would like to refer to the first and only Indian women's publishing
house that has been established in Delhi. The publishing house 'Kali for
Women,' headed by Ritu Menon and Urvashi Butalia was started in one of
their garages two decades ago, but today has transformed to publishing
excellent work of South Asian feminists and others.
The need for such publishing houses is paramount. How else will women
writers obtain a voice to convey their opinions and attitudes? Mainstream
publishing houses have started today to consider women writers seriously,
but this has not always been the case. Furthermore, Kali publishes work
that is not necessarily popular and saleable, but books that contribute
towards a feminist consciousness.
There have also been other enormous changes that we cannot ignore.
Since independence Indian feminists have inspired the South Asian region
in various activities. Recently at the University I had studied at, the
Jawaharlal Nehru University, (JNU) a commission called GSCASH was
established. No, this is not an ATM machine for fast cash withdrawals.
GSCASH stands for Gender Sensitization Committee Against Sexual
Harassment. It has been set up under the guidance of the dynamic Ayesha
Kidwai, a linguist and feminist who teaches there. GSCASH is unique as it
is the first of its kind in India, and possibly even globally. It deals
with sexual harassment cases within the university premises, and concerns
not only students, but faculty and all staff that work in JNU. It makes
strong recommendations to the university when cases are reported and it
negotiates between students, the faculty, the staff, and the
administration.
Often I have heard comments where men protest that such committees
merely privilege women, and are automatically biased against men. GSCASH
is a good example of how a committee can work neutrally to assuage
problems on both sides.
It has often mediated cases where men have also complained of
harassment and have questioned the parties concerned. The term gender
instead of women is used to denote the fact that both sides of the story
are relevant. What is an extremely important element of this committee is
that it helps many men and women who work in JNU no matter what their job
may be. It does not take into account hierarchies when dealing with
harassment. There have been instances where "minor staff' or to be
blunt the sweepers of JNU have been harassed and where GSCASH has appealed
to the university for support and have backed these women.
One such woman was Munni, who cleaned the hostel that I lived in. She
had been staying in JNU accommodation provided for non-academic staff. The
man of the house, her in-law, made advances to her, and when she refused
him, he kicked her out.
GSCASH found temporary accommodation for her, helped her look for a
place to stay and assured her that no further harassment towards her would
be tolerated. This is but one instance when it has worked towards
empowering both men and women.
So, yes, perhaps feminists can complain, as I certainly do, that things
have not moved as far as we would like, and changes are too slow in
coming, that women's movements have disintegrated and mass protest is no
longer possible. Yet, to simply do this is to ignore the enormous gains
made in our region, and to ignore some of the dynamic women who work at
home and around making many differences in our world today.
|
News | Business | Features
| Editorial | Security
Produced by Lake House |